In some ways, it’s hard to find a comparable receiver to Welker. He’s been so productive for so long that it’s easy to be unimpressed with the 118 catches, 1,354 yards, and six touchdowns he had last year, but no receiver had ever switched teams after catching more than 101 catches in a season. Only two receivers — Muhsin Muhammad and Yancey Thigpen — gained more receiving yards in a season than Welker did in 2012 and then played for a new team the next year.
But Welker’s amazingly unique numbers are a product of playing in a very pass-friendly environment on a team that threw 641 passes last year. To compare players across systems and eras, I came up with a wide receiver ranking system last month. That will allow us to look at the best receivers to switch teams and not just the ones from the last couple of decades. For some perspective, Welker ranked 8th among wide receivers last season, although that’s without any Tom Brady-adjustment.
The table below contains a lot of information. It shows receivers who added over 200 yards of value over average in Year N and then played for a new team in Year N+1. For each player, I’ve listed his old team, his age in Year N, some traditional statistics, the amount of value added by the receiver, and his rank among wide receivers. Then starting in the “N+1 tm” category, we see his new team, his statistics in the new season, how much value he added in Year N+1 and his rank in that season.
Name | Yr | Tm | Age | G | Rec | Yd | TD | Val | Rk | N+1 tm | G | Rec | Yd | TD | Val | Rk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yancey Thigpen | 1997 | pit | 28 | 16 | 79 | 1398 | 7 | 842 | 1 | oti | 9 | 38 | 493 | 3 | -58 | 36 |
| Muhsin Muhammad | 2004 | car | 31 | 16 | 93 | 1405 | 16 | 748 | 3 | chi | 15 | 64 | 750 | 4 | 168 | 23 |
| Buddy Dial | 1963 | pit | 26 | 14 | 60 | 1295 | 9 | 703 | 1 | dal | 10 | 11 | 178 | 0 | -722 | 33 |
| John Jefferson | 1980 | sdg | 24 | 16 | 82 | 1340 | 13 | 666 | 1 | gnb | 13 | 39 | 632 | 4 | 0 | 29 |
| Harold Jackson | 1972 | phi | 26 | 14 | 62 | 1048 | 4 | 658 | 3 | ram | 14 | 40 | 874 | 13 | 911 | 1 |
| Roy Jefferson | 1969 | pit | 26 | 14 | 67 | 1079 | 9 | 641 | 1 | clt | 14 | 44 | 749 | 7 | 223 | 19 |
| Jeff Graham | 1995 | chi | 26 | 16 | 82 | 1301 | 4 | 634 | 10 | nyj | 11 | 50 | 788 | 6 | 44 | 28 |
| Laveranues Coles | 2002 | nyj | 25 | 16 | 89 | 1264 | 5 | 590 | 5 | was | 16 | 82 | 1204 | 6 | 472 | 12 |
| Brandon Marshall | 2009 | den | 25 | 15 | 101 | 1120 | 10 | 567 | 6 | mia | 14 | 86 | 1014 | 3 | 272 | 12 |
| Terrell Owens | 2003 | sfo | 30 | 15 | 80 | 1102 | 9 | 563 | 10 | phi | 14 | 77 | 1200 | 14 | 570 | 5 |
| Keyshawn Johnson | 1999 | nyj | 27 | 16 | 89 | 1170 | 8 | 558 | 7 | tam | 16 | 71 | 874 | 8 | 355 | 19 |
| Don Looney | 1940 | phi | 23 | 11 | 58 | 707 | 4 | 520 | 2 | pit | 9 | 10 | 186 | 1 | 67 | 8 |
| Wes Welker | 2012 | nwe | 31 | 16 | 118 | 1354 | 6 | 484 | 8 | den | ||||||
| Art Powell | 1966 | rai | 29 | 14 | 53 | 1026 | 11 | 479 | 4 | buf | 6 | 20 | 346 | 4 | 90 | 8 |
| R.C. Owens | 1961 | sfo | 28 | 14 | 55 | 1032 | 5 | 474 | 6 | clt | 14 | 25 | 307 | 2 | -951 | 37 |
| Ron Jessie | 1974 | det | 26 | 12 | 54 | 761 | 3 | 469 | 3 | ram | 14 | 41 | 547 | 3 | 55 | 23 |
| Brandon Marshall | 2011 | mia | 27 | 16 | 81 | 1214 | 6 | 468 | 6 | chi | 16 | 118 | 1508 | 11 | 1067 | 1 |
| Anthony Miller | 1993 | sdg | 28 | 16 | 84 | 1162 | 7 | 467 | 6 | den | 16 | 60 | 1107 | 5 | -67 | 30 |
| Bob Mann | 1949 | det | 25 | 12 | 66 | 1014 | 4 | 457 | 2 | gnb | 3 | 6 | 89 | 1 | -153 | 17 |
| Terrell Owens | 2005 | phi | 32 | 7 | 47 | 763 | 6 | 442 | 11 | dal | 16 | 85 | 1180 | 13 | 609 | 4 |
| Paul Warfield | 1969 | cle | 27 | 14 | 42 | 886 | 10 | 420 | 8 | mia | 11 | 28 | 703 | 6 | 488 | 8 |
| Darrell Jackson | 2006 | sea | 28 | 13 | 63 | 956 | 10 | 417 | 11 | sfo | 15 | 46 | 497 | 3 | -436 | 105 |
| Santonio Holmes | 2009 | pit | 25 | 16 | 79 | 1248 | 5 | 415 | 14 | nyj | 12 | 52 | 746 | 6 | 144 | 22 |
| Bill Hewitt | 1936 | chi | 27 | 12 | 15 | 358 | 6 | 409 | 2 | phi | 11 | 16 | 197 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Tony Martin | 1998 | atl | 33 | 16 | 66 | 1181 | 6 | 405 | 8 | mia | 16 | 67 | 1037 | 5 | -13 | 33 |
| Keenan McCardell | 2003 | tam | 33 | 16 | 84 | 1174 | 8 | 393 | 15 | sdg | 7 | 31 | 393 | 1 | 46 | 28 |
| Percy Harvin | 2012 | min | 24 | 9 | 62 | 677 | 3 | 362 | 14 | sea | ||||||
| Quinn Early | 1995 | nor | 30 | 16 | 81 | 1087 | 8 | 359 | 17 | buf | 16 | 50 | 798 | 4 | -156 | 46 |
| Harold Jackson | 1977 | ram | 31 | 14 | 48 | 666 | 6 | 358 | 10 | nwe | 16 | 37 | 743 | 6 | 207 | 14 |
| Willard Dewveall | 1960 | chi | 24 | 12 | 43 | 804 | 5 | 351 | 10 | oti | 7 | 12 | 200 | 3 | -227 | 16 |
| Peerless Price | 2002 | buf | 26 | 16 | 94 | 1252 | 9 | 332 | 14 | atl | 16 | 64 | 838 | 3 | 122 | 25 |
| Otto Stowe | 1973 | dal | 24 | 7 | 23 | 389 | 6 | 325 | 12 | den | 8 | 2 | 9 | 1 | -428 | 73 |
| Bob Grim | 1971 | min | 26 | 14 | 45 | 691 | 7 | 321 | 8 | nyg | 13 | 5 | 67 | 1 | -629 | 92 |
| Al Baldwin | 1949 | bba | 26 | 12 | 53 | 719 | 7 | 306 | 2 | gnb | 12 | 28 | 555 | 3 | -348 | 23 |
| Lance Rentzel | 1970 | dal | 27 | 11 | 28 | 556 | 5 | 296 | 13 | ram | 14 | 38 | 534 | 5 | -27 | 28 |
| Art Powell | 1962 | nyj | 25 | 14 | 64 | 1130 | 8 | 288 | 3 | rai | 14 | 73 | 1304 | 16 | 632 | 2 |
| Bert Emanuel | 1997 | atl | 27 | 16 | 65 | 991 | 9 | 288 | 18 | tam | 11 | 41 | 636 | 2 | 38 | 28 |
| Plaxico Burress | 2004 | pit | 27 | 11 | 35 | 698 | 5 | 287 | 17 | nyg | 16 | 76 | 1214 | 7 | 367 | 13 |
| John Gilliam | 1971 | crd | 26 | 14 | 42 | 837 | 3 | 277 | 12 | min | 14 | 47 | 1035 | 7 | 665 | 1 |
| Clyde Goodnight | 1948 | gnb | 24 | 8 | 28 | 448 | 3 | 274 | 4 | was | 10 | 11 | 150 | 0 | -898 | 39 |
| Keenan McCardell | 2001 | jax | 31 | 16 | 93 | 1110 | 6 | 263 | 19 | tam | 14 | 61 | 670 | 6 | -159 | 48 |
| Bill Schroeder | 2001 | gnb | 30 | 14 | 53 | 918 | 9 | 246 | 20 | det | 14 | 36 | 595 | 5 | -357 | 73 |
| Gary Clark | 1992 | was | 30 | 16 | 64 | 912 | 5 | 242 | 10 | crd | 14 | 63 | 818 | 4 | 188 | 18 |
| Eric Martin | 1993 | nor | 32 | 16 | 66 | 950 | 3 | 241 | 11 | kan | 10 | 21 | 307 | 1 | -484 | 80 |
| Terrell Owens | 2008 | dal | 35 | 16 | 69 | 1052 | 10 | 233 | 17 | buf | 16 | 55 | 829 | 5 | 100 | 26 |
| Henry Ellard | 1993 | ram | 32 | 16 | 61 | 945 | 2 | 227 | 12 | was | 16 | 74 | 1397 | 6 | 576 | 5 |
| J.D. Hill | 1975 | buf | 27 | 14 | 36 | 667 | 7 | 226 | 11 | det | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -58 | 38 |
| Roy Jefferson | 1970 | clt | 27 | 14 | 44 | 749 | 7 | 223 | 19 | was | 14 | 47 | 701 | 4 | 302 | 9 |
| Eggs Manske | 1936 | phi | 24 | 12 | 17 | 325 | 0 | 218 | 4 | chi | 11 | 9 | 225 | 3 | 91 | 7 |
| Tony Bova | 1943 | phi | 26 | 10 | 17 | 419 | 5 | 214 | 2 | crd | 9 | 19 | 287 | 2 | -73 | 15 |
| Jim Benton | 1942 | ram | 26 | 9 | 23 | 345 | 1 | 212 | 3 | chi | 9 | 13 | 235 | 3 | -85 | 10 |
| Andre Rison | 1994 | atl | 27 | 15 | 81 | 1088 | 8 | 210 | 13 | cle | 16 | 47 | 701 | 3 | -267 | 59 |
| Rob Moore | 1994 | nyj | 26 | 16 | 78 | 1010 | 6 | 209 | 14 | crd | 15 | 63 | 907 | 5 | 82 | 26 |
| Anquan Boldin | 2009 | crd | 29 | 15 | 84 | 1024 | 4 | 207 | 20 | rav | 16 | 64 | 837 | 7 | 40 | 30 |
| Eric Moulds | 2005 | buf | 32 | 15 | 81 | 816 | 4 | 203 | 22 | htx | 16 | 57 | 557 | 1 | -350 | 85 |
| Derrick Alexander | 1997 | rav | 26 | 15 | 65 | 1009 | 9 | 202 | 21 | kan | 15 | 54 | 992 | 4 | -54 | 35 |
| Billy Parks | 1971 | sdg | 23 | 10 | 41 | 609 | 4 | 202 | 14 | dal | 12 | 18 | 298 | 1 | -319 | 69 |
The gold standard was set by Harold Jackson, who ranked as the #3 receiver in 1972 with the Eagles and then as the top receiver in the league with the Rams in ’73. Then last year, Brandon Marshall had a dominant season in his first year in Chicago. While Marshall (who had an easier transition because he was reunited with Jay Cutler) and Terrell Owens (a couple of times) had immediate success after switching teams, that’s still more the exception than the rule (of course, this ignores players like Randy Moss in 2006-07, because he was too unproductive in Oakland to make the cut-off). There’s no reason to think Welker will bust like Muhammad and Thigpen, but it’s risky to expect business as usual when receivers switch teams. Few positions are as heavily dependent on the players around them as wide receiver, and there is a learning curve involved when dealing with a new team, new coach, new system, and new quarterback. Making matters worse, these types of wide receivers are usually acquired by a poor passing team that expects the new receiver to be the savior. On the other side of the coin, generally speaking, the team letting the receiver move on usually has a reason for doing so.
Of course, few of those factors apply when talking about Welker in Denver. He’ll be playing with Peyton Manning and can take over the role filled by Brandon Stokley last year. Manning loves throwing to his inside receiver and a player that runs precise routes and can dominate the short and intermediate areas of the field fits Manning’s game well. I doubt Welker comes close to the numbers he produced in New England simply because there are too many talented mouths to feed (Eric Decker and Demaryius Thomas aren’t going anywhere) in Denver. But Welker doesn’t need to put up monster numbers in 2013 to make the move pay off for the Broncos. As Mike Tanier noted, the signing will only slightly upgrade the Denver offense, but should significantly hinder the Patriots. In an AFC that appears to feature just two heavyweights, that’s more than enough to make Denver the clear frontrunner to represent the AFC in Super Bowl XLVIII. Then the Broncos capped off the day by adding Dominque Rodgers-Cromartie. It’s early on, but it’s been a good week for Denver so far.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
Chase, I’m willing to defer to you since I think you do excellent qualitative analysis (especially since Football Perspective isn’t supposed to be a qualitative site), but do you really think 1) Stokley -> Welker is a smaller jump than Welker -> Amendola + Edleman? And, 2) will feeding Welker in Denver really be harder with Decker and Thomas than it was with Gronk and Hernandez, plus RBs catching passes in NE?
I know nothing about Mike Tanier, so maybe I should give him more credit. To me though, his article was a lot of hand waiving. Welker is a system player, but ‘system’ is defined by ‘one of two completely different offenses Welker found himself in.’ Likewise assuming there is a fixed pool of production Welker can draw from in Denver, and all he can add is his YPC, seems very silly. Welker’s superior skills, if they exist, generate more yards and first downs, and hence more attempts. Putting Jerry Rice circa 1990 and Marvin Harrison circa 2000 on the Jets last year doesn’t mean they only get to share the 85 receptions their top two WRs managed.
I think Tanier article illustrates how criminally underrated Welker is, and it bums me out that he’s only switching teams when his physical skills will degrade due to age. Yes he had Brady, but great WRs have had great QBs throughout the league’s history. I’m hardly an expert at diagraming plays, but while I’m sure there are some throws Brady gets to Wekler other QBs wouldn’t, just like Mike Wallace on a go route might make Tannehill look better, can’t a lower end QB throw a screen to Welker and get a stat boost through YAC? Is that throw hard? Sure some of the stuff over the middle might be, but again for every option route Welker got to run in NE, wouldn’t the super precise route running on prescribed routes between the hashes be easier for any QB to throw the ball to?
Sunrise089,
You shouldn’t defer to me on anything. I think you bring up some good points.
I think the reasons to expect Welker’s numbers to drop are:
– The Patriots run a ton of playhs — they ran 101 more than the Broncos last yera and threw 53 more passes. That’s because they run a quick-tempo offense and set a league record with 444 first downs. So the numbers of all of their players are inflated. Now if you think the first downs are due to Welker, and the Broncos will run a similar style of offense, then you have a point. My opinion is that Fox is too conservative for that. I suspect if Denver’s offense becomes better, they’ll just end up running more in the 4th quarters of games.
– Regarding supporting casts, the key to remember is Gronkowski and Hernandez missed a combined 11 full games and parts of others. So I think feeding him will be harder just because of the assumption that guys like Decker and Thomas will stay healthy.
– Manning led the NFL in completion percentage, NY/A, and ANY/A. On some level, there’s a question of how much better can their offense really get? Denver already has an outstanding passing offense, so as good as Welker may be, the law of diminishing returns applies here.
Welker’s raw numbers might drop, but I think his efficiency stats will get a boost in Denver, based on his supporting cast. Denver’s talented pass-catchers are complementary players to Welker. They’re outside receivers who play a vertical game and force defenses to pull more defenders out into deep zones. All of the talent in New England last year was tight ends and slot receiver types. Some teams might be willing to take their chances with fewer deep defenders against them because nobody on New England was scaring people by getting deep on a consistent basis. I mean, does anybody really think Brandon Lloyd is as good as his one monster year?
If I were scheming for NE, I’d run a lot of combo coverages with a decent corner manned up on Welker and a lot of players in underneath zones, and I’d venture to guess that your average NFL defensive coordinator is quite a bit smarter than I am. You can make it hard to get the ball to a slot receiver when the guys on the outside suck. Denver has Decker and Thomas who can outrun physical corners and go up and take the ball away from the fast ones, so you’re asking for trouble if you don’t keep two safeties deep. That means more room for Welker to operate. Brandon Stokley just had what was probably the second-best season of his career in that offense, and Welker isn’t 36 or practically talentless like Stokley is.
I suspect Welker will take a significant number of targets away from the tight ends and backs in Denver. There’s no reason to throw the ball to Joel Dreessen or a back in the flat when Wes Welker is always open.
I agree that Welker’s a good fit. The problem with the Patriots is that they’re versatile enough to run effectively out of multiple formations and they don’t always let the defense get set; that enables the quick pass to Welker to be even more effective.
I think the Broncos offense is going to be great next year, but again, marginal returns. They were great last year.
Welker was effective in a no-huddle, quick-snap offense, but he doesn’t need a no-huddle, quick-snap offense to be effective. Most of his best years in NE, Tom Brady spent a lot of time at the line of scrimmage changing routes and blocking schemes, and Welker ran a lot of option routes, which is how Manning runs an offense and uses a slot receiver. I’m sure Denver will run plenty of no-huddle, too, since the team’s real offensive coordinator is out on the field, anyway.
To be clear, I’m a big fan of Welker’s game. I think the Pats made a big mistake letting him go.
{ 1 trackback }