≡ Menu

The college football regular season is over. Florida State ends the year as the only unbeaten team, even if the defining characteristic of the Noles’ season was their inability to ever earn any style points. FSU ends the regular season a mind-boggling 3-10 against the spread, which is all you need to know about how the team played relative to expectations on a weekly basis.

Most agree that Alabama and Oregon are the top two teams in the country; the SRS agrees with the consensus! The Crimson Tide have emerged with an SRS rating of 62.0, with the Ducks narrowly behind at 61.5.  The Seminoles are down at 15 in the SRS, which is unsurprising to regular readers.  The SRS is a predictive system, like Las Vegas; this implies that Florida State would be an underdog to all the top teams, which is hard to argue against.

Of course, FSU will take one of the four golden tickets, as will Alabama and Oregon.  The fourth spot in the first ever college football playoff will come down to TCU, Ohio State, or Baylor.  The SRS is not necessarily a great way to decide which team should advance — after all, that should be based more on resume than on best team — but it can be instructive to look at the ratings.  In this case, those three teams check in at #3, #5, and #6.

As always thanks to Dr. Peter R. Wolfe for providing the weekly game logs. Some more playoff thoughts about the jump:

RkTeamConfConf RkGMOVSOSSRSREC
1AlabamaSEC11317.344.762.112-1
2OregonP121132140.561.512-1
3TCUB1211221.839.26111-1
4MississippiSEC2121444.558.49-3
5Ohio StateB1011319.338.958.212-1
6BaylorB1221220.337.557.811-1
7GeorgiaSEC3121641.457.49-3
8Michigan StB1021219.137.756.910-2
9AuburnSEC4128.348.156.48-4
10Mississippi StSEC51214.641.355.910-2
11Kansas StB1231212.341.954.19-3
12OklahomaB1241211.242.153.38-4
13ArkansasSEC6128.344.352.66-6
14LSUSEC712844.652.68-4
15Florida StACC11312.239.952.113-0
16Southern CalP1221210.341.551.88-4
17Georgia TechACC2131140.251.210-3
18UCLAP123125.345.550.89-3
19WisconsinB1031312.138.250.210-3
20MissouriSEC8136.243.149.310-3
21ArizonaP124137.341.849.110-3
22StanfordP125128.540.348.87-5
23NebraskaB1041210.737.648.39-3
24Arizona StP126128.839.348.19-3
25Texas A&MSEC9125.442.5487-5
26FloridaSEC10116.241.647.86-5
27West VirginiaB125125.442.347.77-5
28LouisvilleACC3121136.647.69-3
29ClemsonACC4129.837.847.69-3
30TennesseeSEC11122.44547.46-6
31MarshallCUSA11320.526.246.812-1
32UtahP127123.842.145.88-4
33Boise StMWC11311.733.645.311-2
34WashingtonP128136.338.544.78-5
35MinnesotaB105124.939.744.68-4
36Miami FLACC5124.739.944.66-6
37Louisiana TechCUSA21310.633.243.98-5
38Notre DameInd1122.640.943.57-5
39Boston CollegeACC6125.137.9437-5
40DukeACC71210.432.542.99-3
41Virginia TechACC8122.639.842.46-6
42TexasB12612-0.74342.46-6
43MemphisAmer11214.427.742.19-3
44South CarolinaSEC12120.941.1426-6
45Colorado StMWC21211.829.941.710-2
46IowaB106123.73841.67-5
47VirginiaACC9120.240.941.15-7
48PittsburghACC10123.936.740.66-6
49MarylandB107120.839.840.67-5
50CincinnatiAmer2127.931.639.59-3
51Brigham YoungInd2128.829.938.78-4
52CaliforniaP12912-341.538.55-7
53East CarolinaAmer31210.328.238.58-4
54Utah StMWC3136.931.538.49-4
55Oklahoma StB12712-4.342.638.36-6
56North Carolina StACC11122.136.238.37-5
57MichiganB10812-1.74038.35-7
58KentuckySEC1312-341.238.25-7
59Penn StateB109120.737.237.96-6
60North CarolinaACC1212-3.140.737.66-6
61Central FloridaAmer412928.337.39-3
62NorthwesternB101012-2.439.136.75-7
63Georgia SouthernSun11213.322.936.29-3
64Western KentuckyCUSA312530.9367-5
65NavyInd3113.732.135.86-5
66RutgersB101112-3.438.234.97-5
67NevadaMWC4122.73234.77-5
68Arkansas StSun2127.127.534.67-5
69Western MichiganMAC1129.624.934.58-4
70Northern IllinoisMAC2138.126.434.411-2
71Washington StP121012-7.541.834.33-9
72IllinoisB101212-6.140.334.36-6
73ToledoMAC3124.829.334.18-4
74Alabama-BirminghamCUSA4122.731.233.96-6
75Oregon StP121112-639.633.65-7
76HoustonAmer5127.52633.57-5
77Texas TechB12812-9.843.233.44-8
78Air ForceMWC5126.826.533.39-3
79San Diego StMWC6124.827.932.77-5
80ColoradoP121212-10.342.832.42-10
81SyracuseACC1312-840.332.33-9
82IndianaB101312-6.738.932.14-8
83TempleAmer6123.628.532.16-6
84PurdueB101412-8.840.131.33-9
85RiceCUSA512-0.331.3317-5
86Iowa StB12912-13.944.730.82-10
87Central MichiganMAC4122.927.830.77-5
88Louisiana-LafayetteSun3122.62830.78-4
89Fresno StMWC713-3.133.430.36-7
90UTEPCUSA6120.429.730.17-5
91KansasB121012-12.942.129.23-9
92Middle Tennessee StCUSA712-0.529.629.16-6
93Appalachian StSun4125.822.728.67-5
94Florida Int'lCUSA812-2.329.3274-8
95WyomingMWC812-9.236.126.94-8
96Texas St-San MarcosSun5124.322.626.97-5
97Ball StMAC512026.626.65-7
98VanderbiltSEC1412-14.741.326.53-9
99South AlabamaSun612-2.929.326.46-6
100Hawai`iMWC913-6.632.826.24-9
101Wake ForestACC1412-11.136.225.13-9
102Louisiana-MonroeSun712-5.530.525.14-8
103Florida AtlanticCUSA912-8.333.224.93-9
104Old DominionCUSA1012-4.52924.46-6
105Bowling GreenMAC613-3.427.824.47-6
106AkronMAC712-0.524.824.35-7
107New MexicoMWC1012-7.531.724.34-8
108San José StMWC1112-8.532.624.13-9
109BuffaloMAC811122.923.85-6
110Ohio U.MAC912-427.823.86-6
111Texas-San AntonioCUSA1112-8.231.723.54-8
112South FloridaAmer712-9.132.323.24-8
113TulaneAmer812-1234.822.83-9
114Southern MissCUSA1212-13.835.121.33-9
115MassachusettsMAC1012-5.626.921.33-9
116North TexasCUSA1312-4.826.121.34-8
117Miami OHMAC1112-9.429.720.22-10
118ArmyInd411-7.827.920.14-7
119TulsaAmer912-13.332.4192-10
120Kent StMAC1211-11.229.918.72-9
121ConnecticutAmer1012-13.630.7172-10
122TroySun812-11.528.116.63-9
123UNLVMWC1213-15.131.316.22-11
124IdahoSun911-12.627.214.61-10
125New Mexico StSun1012-12.827.114.22-10
126SMUAmer1112-24.236.512.41-11
127Georgia StSun1112-1829.611.61-11
128Eastern MichiganMAC1312-20.630.910.32-10

As you can see, it’s the TCU Horned Frogs that take the third spot in the SRS.  Yesterday, I explained why Baylor’s head-to-head win over TCU was not the definitive word on the Baylor/TCU question. And while I would not use the SRS to break the TCU/BU/OSU headlock, let’s see why the ratings are what they are:

  • TCU earned SRS grades of over 70 points for beating Texas 48-10 in Austin, Kansas State 41-20, and Texas Tech 82(!) to 27.  TCU’s worst game wasn’t its lost: in fact, TCU’s worst four games were wins.  Losing by three points in Waco earned TCU an SRS grade of 57.8, which is better than what TCU received in close wins against West Virginia and Kansas, and what the Horned Frogs got for blowing out SMU and Samford. TCU also finishes the year with the best MOV among all teams (remember, the table above is fully sortable), and the best margin of victory in FBS games.
  • The argument for TCU is the lack of warts: the worst performance of the year was a close game against Kansas, but in light of what Florida has done this year, close wins against bad teams tend to get overlooked.  There is a certain elegance in considering the five one-loss teams as a group: after all, why are Alabama and Oregon given the top spots when TCU, Baylor, and OSU all have just one loss, too?  If you group the teams based on their loss, TCU clearly stands out: the Horned Frogs lost to Baylor (#6 in the SRS), the Tide lost to Mississippi (#4), and the Ducks lost to Arizona (#21). Meanwhile, Baylor lost to West Virginia (#27) and Ohio State lost to Virginia Tech (#41).
  • Ohio State is #5 in the SRS, which may surprise some folks. A 6-1 Ohio State team was down at #14 in the SRS, but the Buckeyes have made quite a jump over the last six weeks. Even two weeks ago, OSU was still at #10. So what happened? Well, Ohio State’s 59-0 blowout of Wisconsin checks in as the single best game of the year, catapulting the Buckeyes into the top five.
  • The best argument for Ohio State is that the Buckeyes are hot, as evidenced by what we saw last night. The worst argument? Ohio State lost at home, by 14 points, to 6-6 Virginia Tech. The Big 10 was not very good this year, so Ohio State’s best wins came against #8 Michigan State, #19 Wisconsin, #35 Minnesota, #49 Maryland. TCU beat #11 KSU, #12 Oklahoma, #27 West Virginia, #35 Minnesota, and #42 Texas, while sporting the much, much better loss.  Baylor can argue for the best set of wins: over #3 TCU, #11 KSU, #12 Oklahoma, #27 West Virginia, and #42 Texas.
  • So why not Baylor for the 4th spot?  The Bears have a great argument, but they do have the weakest schedule of the three teams vying for the last spot. And despite the easiest schedule, the Bears have the lowest margin of victory.  We’re picking nits here, of course, but that’s why Baylor is down at #6 in the SRS. Baylor scored just a 36.7 in the SRS in the West Virginia loss and a 40.4 in the 2-point win over Texas Tech, two games which really hurt Baylor’s rating.  The Bears’ best game of the year, by SRS purposes, wasn’t the 3-point home win against TCU: it was the 34-point win in Norman against the Sooners.
  • The best — or perhaps simplest — argument for Baylor goes something like this.  The Big 12 is better than the Big 10 this year.  In addition, the Big 12 went 3-0 against the B10, with TCU beating Minnesota, West Virginia winning at Maryland, and lowly Iowa State winning at Iowa.  Therefore, you should drop Ohio State out of the picture, and then we revert to a two-team race. That race, of course, should be decided by head-to-head.  That’s the Baylor argument in two sentences.

So what will happen today? I have no idea, but I do know some powers that be would love (1) having a Big 10-Pac-12 game in the Rose Bowl, (2) not getting caught up in the TCU/Baylor debate, and (3) having the final golden ticket going to the team that probably has a larger fan base than the other two schools combined. What will happen? Who knows: we’ll find out in less than two hours.

Finally, you can view the ratings from each game right here, which explains how each team’s rating is calculated.

  • Andreas

    Any chance you can post the final ratings for non-FBS teams? As an alum of a D3 school that went undefeated this year, I am very curious to see how they stacked up

    • Chase Stuart

      Yes. Which school? I’ll post the full list at some point.

    • Chase Stuart

      Six D3 teams went undefeated. Mount Union had the best SRS rating (+21.1) among all D3 teams; Amhert was 3rd (of note: Amherst went 8-0; all others were 12-0) at +13.9. UW-Whitewater was 9th at 11.0, Wartburg was 10th at 10.6, Widener 15th at 1.2, and Hobart was 31st at -5.0

      • Andreas

        Awesome, thanks! I’m an Amherst grad, so I will take that 3rd place finish with pride.

        Of course it comes with a bit of an asterisk, since Amherst’s conference (the NESCAC) only plays games against each other, which makes it really hard to calibrate strength of schedule against the rest of D3. That said, I suspect that’s the case for many conferences outside D1, and I’m not sure there’s anything that can be done about it.