Previous post:

Next post:

Open thread: Will John Harbaugh’s success influence future head coach hires?

by Chase Stuart on January 24, 2013

in Coaches, Team Building, Theory

When you think about the Ravens under John Harbaugh — or just about any time in their existence — you think of a defensive team. Under Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, Terrell Suggs, and Haloti Ngata, Baltimore has fielded dominant defenses for much of the last decade. Marvin Lewis, Baltimore’s defensive coordinator from 1996 to 2001, was rewarded with the head coaching job in Cincinnati after his years of excellent service. He was replaced by Mike Nolan, who after coordinating the defense for three years in Baltimore, was tapped to revive the 49ers. His replacement, Rex Ryan, excelled for four years in Baltimore, and was then chosen by the Jets to be their next head coach. The Ravens replaced Ryan with Greg Mattison, who was lured by his friend Brady Hoke to take the DC job at Michigan in 2011. He was replaced by Chuck Pagano, who coordinated the Baltimore defense for only a year (after spending three as the defensive backs coach) before the Colts selected him to be their next head coach. Dean Pees is the current DC in Baltimore.

Suffice it to say, with so many prominent names roaming the sidelines and coordinating the defenses in Baltimore, there are few fingerprints from either John Harbaugh or his predecessor Brian Billick on the great Ravens defenses. When you look at Baltimore’s offense under Harbaugh, you immediately think of Cam Cameron, who excelled so much in his role as OC in San Diego that he was hired by the Miami Dolphins in 2007. Cameron’s Dolphins went 1-15 and he was fired after only one year, but Harbaugh chose Cameron to be his first offensive coordinator. Then, with three weeks remaining in the regular season, Harbaugh fired Cameron and promoted Jim Caldwell to OC.

That’s a long bit of background to say this: John Harbaugh isn’t in charge of the Baltimore offense or the Baltimore defense. At least when Brian Billick was around, you knew the offense would be crafted in his image, even if it wasn’t successful. But there’s a reason you don’t think of Harbaugh when you think of the specific offensive/defensive units in Baltimore: that’s because he made his name as a Special Teams coach.

Vermeil never got the 'genius' label so he had to settle for this thing.

Vermeil never got the 'genius' label so he had to settle for this thing.

When most teams look to hire a head coach, the tend to focus on the elite offensive and defensive coordinators (or, in recent times, just those with offensive backgrounds). In addition to Harbaugh, there are a few other examples. Dick Vermeil is probably the most famous example: Vermeil was hired by George Allen in 1969 as the first ever special teams coach in the NFL. Vermeil won the Super Bowl with the 1999 Rams, thanks in no small part due to his decision to hire Mike Martz (who himself went to a Super Bowl after he hired Lovie Smith to coach his defense). Marv Levy is another one: while he was a college head coach for over a decade, he broke into the NFL as a special teams coach for three different teams, and brought Ted Marchibroda to Buffalo with him in 1989.1

There are good reasons for owners and general managers to prefer a special teams coach over a similarly-qualified coach with an offensive or defensive background. Many times, the “whiz kid” coordinators struggle to shake that habit once they are promoted — see Rex Ryan, Mike Martz — and often ignore the other side of the ball. In Dallas, Jason Garrett kept his role as play-caller even after being promoted to head coach. That led, in my opinion, to Garrett becoming overwhelmed on gameday, as the Cowboys have constantly mismanaged end-of-half and end-of-game situations. Now, Jerry Jones has removed that role from Garrett (Bill Callahan will be calling the plays in 2013), which should relieve some of the burden on his plate, and in my opinion, make him a better coach. While many great coaches have called their own plays, being a head coach is about much more than calling plays, and Garrett needs to transition to that role if he wants to succeed.

There’s another reason why I like the idea of hiring a special teams coach as your head coach: I suspect it is easier to attract the best candidates for OC and DC when those coaches know that they will be running the show. Mike Tomlin was fortunate enough to inherit Dick LeBeau, but in general, it’s probably harder for defensive head coaches to hire the promising young DC who wants to make a name for himself. Similarly, Harbaugh probably has an advantage when it comes to hiring his OC, too, because that man knows he will get all the credit. Lovie Smith was the linebackers coach on a team coached by Tony Dungy on a defense run by Monte Kiffin; if he wanted to make a name for himself, he needed to go to a team where he would be the face of the defense, and that was to St. Louis’ benefit. The brothers Gruden both sought out their first OC job under defensive-minded head coaches (Ray Rhodes for Jon and Marvin Lewis for Jay). A special teams coach has the benefit of being able to attract the best offensive coordinators and best defensive coordinators.

Being a head coach is more about managing a team, creating a vision for the roster, hiring talented people, and being a leader more than it is about play-calling. I wonder if the success of Harbaugh will bring about a new wave of special team coaches in the NFL.

  1. In addition, Mike Ditka also coached special teams under Tom Landy, while Chan Gailey and Gregg Williams both broke into the NFL on special teams. Ken Whisenhunt was the Jets special teams coach in 2000, and while Bill Cowher and Bill Belichick made their names as defensive coaches, both started off as special teams coaches, too. []

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Danish January 24, 2013 at 9:12 am

*nods in agreement*

I think a team “manager” is the ideal kind of HC. Gameplans and playcalling are so complex, that it seems overwhelming on gameday.

Maybe a guy like John Harbaugh makes better clock-management and go-for-it decisions too, because he doesnt have to worry about getting the right play and personnel in?

The question is: How do you find the guysl ike Harbaugh? I mean the general MO to finding HC candidates is to look at well performing coordinators, but how do you “scout” talented leaders.

Reply

Chase Stuart January 24, 2013 at 12:25 pm

Thanks Danish. Agreed on that question – I think it’s close to impossible to do from an outside perspective, but talking to coaches/front office people, I suspect you can get a sense. I don’t know if the Ravens had informal talks with Andy Reid, but I could see Harbaugh’s reputation as a good leader, a coach who is organized, efficient, gets players to buy in, etc., getting out.

Reply

Richie January 24, 2013 at 3:44 pm

I would think that the ability to be a good coordinator and the ability to be a good head coach are not necessarily the same thing. I would really be curious to know how “coordinator success” and “this guy can be a manager of men” are weighted in hiring decisions.

Reply

Danish January 25, 2013 at 5:25 am

Oh I’m not saying it is the same thing. I’m saying that the managers are better. I’m also saying that you can’t measure the managing skills by how good of a coordinator a guy is – but that seems to about all it comes to. To an outsider like me at least.

Reply

Richie January 24, 2013 at 3:41 pm

Hey, I think this is a catch-22! If every team hires a special teams guy as HC, then nobody will want to be an OC or a DC, because the only way you can get a HC job is to coach special teams! hehe

Reply

Chase Stuart January 24, 2013 at 4:11 pm

Another example to think about is Tom Coughlin. It’s easy to forget that his background is as a wide receivers coach, what with his teams generally being known for tough defense. But he’s let Kevin Gilbride run the offense in New York (after letting Gilbride, and then Chris Palmer and Bobby Petrino do the same in Jacksonville) and has hired two good DCs (Steve Spagnuolo, Perry Fewell) on defense.

Reply

Chase Stuart January 24, 2013 at 4:20 pm

A couple of other examples.

In 2006, Wade Phillips ran the defense, Cam Cameron ran the offense, and many said Marty barely did anything on that team. They went 14-2, but the point was that San Diego could survive without him (and they fired him after the playoff loss to New England, and brought in Norv Turner. Of course, both Cameron and Phillips got HC jobs after that season.)

A lifetime ago in NY, Jim Lee Howell had it pretty sweet. He had Lombardi as his OC and Landry as his DC. The old line is that one day, a visitor in the Giants’ offices saw Landry studying film in one room, Lombardi drawing plays on a chalkboard in another, and Howell reading a newspaper in a third.

Reply

Richie January 24, 2013 at 7:38 pm

and they fired him after the playoff loss to New England, and brought in Norv Turner

How many coaches have been fired after a 14-2 season?

In Turner’s last 2 seasons combined the Chargers only won 15 games. I thought firing Schottenheimer was a bad idea at the time, and stand by it now.

Reply

Andy Barall January 24, 2013 at 5:43 pm

Before they became head coaches, Dan Reeves and Mike Ditka were both special teams coaches for the Cowboys under Tom Landry; Reeves in 1974 and Ditka from 1975-1981.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <strong> <em> <pre> <code> <a href="" title="">

{ 7 trackbacks }