≡ Menu

The Alabama Crimson Tide once again dominated the draft, as did the entire Southeastern Conference. Three Alabama players — defensive tackle Quinnen Williams, guard Jonah Williams, and running back Josh Jacobs — went in the first round, and the school had 10 players selected in the 2019 Draft, the most of any school this year. And based on the Football Perspective Draft Value Chart, Alabama also had the most draft value of any school, followed by Ohio State, Clemson, and Oklahoma.

The table below shows the draft value each school produced in 2019:

RKCollegeConferencePlayersDraft Value
1AlabamaSEC1091
2Ohio St.Big Ten979.7
3ClemsonACC678.8
4OklahomaBig 12876.4
5MichiganBig Ten555.5
6Mississippi St.SEC554.7
7WashingtonPac-12851
8IowaBig Ten446
9KentuckySEC540.7
10LSUSEC337.8
11MississippiSEC634.8
12Boston Col.ACC432.4
13FloridaSEC530
14GeorgiaSEC729.4
15North Carolina St.ACC429.3
16Notre DameInd628.6
17HoustonAmerican325.2
18Texas A&MSEC724.3
19UtahPac-12523.8
20StanfordPac-12523.4
21DukeACC123.2
22TCUBig 12323
23Penn St.Big Ten622.3
24West VirginiaBig 12520
25MarylandBig Ten317.8
26Florida St.ACC217.5
27Washington St.Pac-12216.5
28Arizona St.Pac-12216.4
29TempleAmerican315.2
30USCPac-12414.8
31Alabama St.fcs114.6
32WisconsinBig Ten414.5
33South CarolinaSEC313.1
34Iowa St.Big 12212.4
35Central MichiganMAC212.3
36VanderbiltSEC211.8
37AuburnSEC611.7
37Kansas St.Big 12211.7
39MissouriSEC211.2
40MemphisAmerican211.2
40Michigan St.Big Ten211.2
42Miami (FL)ACC510.9
43Northern IllinoisMAC210.8
44HawaiiMWC210.6
45ToledoMAC29.3
46VirginiaACC29.1
47Central FloridaAmerican18.7
48Delawarefcs18.5
49MassachusettsInd18.3
50ArkansasSEC38.2
51BaylorBig 1217.8
52San Jose St.MWC17.6
53Florida AtlanticCUSA27.4
54Old DominionCUSA27
55BYUInd16.7
56CharlotteCUSA16.5
57West. Illinoisfcs16.4
58Louisiana TechCUSA16.3
59San Diego St.MWC16.2
60OregonPac-1245.9
60Sioux Fallsfcs15.9
62Oklahoma St.Big 1235.8
63Boise St.MWC15.1
64East. MichiganMAC14.9
65Wake ForestACC13.9
66IndianaBig Ten13.6
67Charleston (WV)fcs13.4
68RutgersBig Ten22.6
68PittsburghACC12.6
70TexasBig 1222.5
71MinnesotaBig Ten12.4
72Tarleton St.fcs12.1
73NorthwesternBig Ten12
73North Dakota St.fcs12
75North CarolinaACC11.8
76Fresno St.MWC11.7
77Washburnfcs11.5
78ColoradoPac-1211.3
79SE Missouri St.fcs11.2
79WyomingMWC11.2
81Elonfcs11.1
82La-MonroeSun Belt10.8
83Bowling GreenMAC10.6
83AkronMAC10.6
85IllinoisBig Ten10.4
85Utah St.MWC10.4
87TulaneAmerican10.2
87South Dakota St.fcs10.2
89SyracuseACC10
89CincinnatiAmerican10
89Texas TechBig 1210
89North Carolina A&Tfcs10
89James Madisonfcs10
89Prairie Viewfcs10
89Valdosta St.fcs10
89Idahofcs10
89Morgan St.fcs10
89Colorado St.MWC10
89Air ForceMWC10
89ArizonaPac-1210
89UCLAPac-1210

Alabama’s dominance in the draft was part of an even more impressive showing by the conference as a whole. Eight of the top 18 teams in draft value came from the SEC, including 5 teams from the SEC West. The graph below shows how much draft value each conference produced in 2019:

And here’s the same data in table form:

RkConfDraft Value
1SEC398.7
2Big Ten258
3ACC209.5
4Big 12159.6
5Pac-12153.1
6American60.5
-fcs46.9
-Ind43.6
7MAC38.5
8MWC32.8
9CUSA27.2
10Sun Belt0.8

Some other draft notes:

  • Tennessee was the only SEC school that did not produce a draft pick in 2019.
  • In the Big 10, Purdue and Nebraska were the only two schools that did not have a player drafted.  For Nebraska, this ended a steak of having at least one player drafted in every year since 1963.
  • Kansas was the only Big 12 school without a draft pick in 2019.
  • In the Pac 12, California and Oregon State were the two schools shut out from the Draft.
  • Louisville, Georgia Tech, and Virginia Tech were ACC schools without a player selected in the 2019 Draft.
  • Houston, Temple, and Central Michigan were the three non-Power 5 schools with the most draft value.
  • Three schools went 1-11 and still produced at least one draft pick: Rutgers, San Jose State, and Central Michigan.
  • Just two first round picks did not go to a Power 5 school, and both have Houston ties.  With the 9th pick, the Bills selected Houston DT Ed Oliver, and with the 23rd pick, the Texans drafted Alabama State OT Tytus Howard.

 

{ 0 comments }

The 2019 Draft Class Was Another QB-Heavy Draft

The 2019 Draft was another good one for quarterbacks. Oklahoma QB Kyler Murray was the first overall pick to the Cardinals, Duke passer Daniel Jones was taken by the Giants with sixth pick, and Ohio State’s Dwayne Haskins was the 15th pick to Washington. The Broncos took Missouri Tiger Drew Lock with the 42nd pick, rounding out the class of top prospects.

Over the last 20 years, there were 56 quarterbacks selected in the first round, or just under three per year; there were also 68 quarterbacks taken in the first 50 picks, so the 2019 class was slightly more quarterback-heavy than normal.  It was also the 14th time in the last 20 drafts that a quarterback went first overall.

The draft below shows the draft capital — using the Football Perspective Draft Value Chart to assign draft capital to each pick — used on quarterbacks in all drafts since 1967.  As you can see, 2019 was not as quarterback-heavy as 2018, but it was still a draft that saw more draft capital used on quarterbacks than average.

[continue reading…]

{ 1 comment }

The NFL Draft is a good way to measure how the league values particular positions. Last year, it seemed as though the running game was back in vogue: after quarterback, running back was perhaps the most highly valued position in the 2018 Draft, and a lot of draft capital was used on non-pass rushing linebackers.

Which positions did NFL teams focus on in the 2019 NFL Draft? We can use the Football Perspective Draft Value Chart to answer that question pretty easily for the first 224 picks (all picks after that have been excluded, since they have a draft value of zero).  This was a draft for interior defensive linemen and edge rushers, but even more notable was the absence of draft capital spent on interior offensive linemen.

Consider that 3 out of every 22 players on a football field, at all times, is a guard or center.  All else being equal, you would expect 14% of all draft picks and all draft capital to be spent on interior offensive linemen.  That means 1 out of every 7.3 draft picks should be an offensive guard or center, but in the first 73 draft picks, there were just 5 interior offensive linemen selected.  Just 8% of the first 100 picks were guards or centers, and overall, only 8.4% of all draft capital was spent on guards and centers. Here’s the full list of draftees. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }