Previous post:

Next post:

The 1956 NFL Season: The Forward Pass on Life Support

by Chase Stuart on February 25, 2014

in History

The history of offense in the NFL is not a linear one. The early ’70s was the dead-ball era of the passing game, and it’s largely true that pass frequency and efficiency have steadily increased since then. But NFL teams passed more frequently in the ’60s than they did in the ’70s, and passing ratios wildly fluctuated in the ’50s. The picture below shows the league-average pass ratio for the NFL1 for each year from 1950 to 1980. Pass ratio is simply defined as (Pass Attempts + Sacks) / (Pass Attempts + Sacks + Rush Attempts).

p-r rat2

As you can see, 1956 represents a huge outlier over the 30-year period. Pass ratios dropped significantly in 1956, increased slightly in 1957, and then spiked back up, seemingly without reason. The other main valley, of course, was in the mid-1970s. The pass-to-run ratio dropped every year after the merger before plummeting to 43% in ’73. It spiked back up temporarily in ’74 and ’75 before dropping again, bottoming out at 42% in ’77 and necessitating the 1978 rules changes.

The next graph shows the league-average ANY/A for each season (in green) and the Adjusted Yards per Carry average (Rushing Yards + 20*Rushing TDs) / (Rush Attempts) in red. As you can see, passing was slightly more effective than rushing in the mid-’60s, which presumably caused a shift towards more passing. As pass efficiency decreased, so did pass attempts.

p-r eff2

From 1950 to 1953, teams averaged roughly 3.25 ANY/A, and at least based on the efficiency numbers, they did not run as often as they should have. Teams passed on 49% of all plays in ’53 and ’54 and on 47% of all plays in 1958. But in the three intervening years, the forward pass nearly evaporated, with the nadir coming in 1956 (39.3%).

It’s hard to explain what caused the shift. After all, teams averaged 3.9 Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt from ’54 to ’57, so it seems odd that teams essentially gave up passing without a concomitant justification. It’s possible that the shift was in response to the low-efficiency numbers earlier in the decade, and the return to the more balanced approach later in the decade only occurred once pass efficiency numbers improved.  To investigate, I looked at the pass/run ratios and gross umber of pass attempts for each team in 1954, 1956, and 1958, to get a sense of which teams were causing the big shift in the middle.

Tm
1954 P/R
1954 Pass
1956 P/R
1956 Pass
1958 P/R
1958 Pass
RAM43.7%33547.6%34952.7%384
GNB58%44352.7%37552.5%381
DET51.1%41037.8%30849.1%351
CHI56%45033%26444%344
PIT52.1%40144.6%33347.1%351
WAS40.7%29331.3%22837.1%283
SFO45.3%36644%32953.1%407
NYG47.9%35035.8%27838.3%279
CRD47.4%37730.2%22853.7%424
BAL49.1%35141.8%31044.6%367
PHI52.4%44240.1%28055.2%411
CLE40.2%32031.6%22232.3%227
AVG48.7%37839.2%29246.6%351

Three teams made most drastic changes in pass/run ratio, but no team shifted philosophies quite like the Bears. In 1954 the team had George Blanda and Zeke Bratkowski and a pair of young receivers in Harlon Hill and Jim Dooley. Despite an 8-4 record the ’54 Bears led the NFL in pass attempts. In 1955 Rick Casares joined Chicago and Ed Brown took over at quarterback, ushering in a run-first era. In 1956 the Bears ran on nearly two-thirds of their plays; when they didn’t run, Brown would throw it deep to Hill, who caught 47 passes for 1,128 yards and 11 TDs in 12 games, the 13th most dominant season by any wide receiver.

The Eagles and Cardinals also underwent significant change. The ’54 Eagles were relatively pass-happy with Adrian Burk and Bobby Thomason at quarterback and a 31-year-old Pete Pihos. The next year the Eagles led the NFL with 400 pass attempts (excluding sacks), but that number dropped to just 249 the following season. What happened? For starters, a coaching change that seemed to usher in a more run-happy environment. And with Pihos retired and #2 WR Bill Stribling injured, the quarterbacks really struggled in 1956, as Thomason and Burk threw just 5 touchdowns against 27 interceptions (they threw 52 TDs and 53 INTs in ’54 and ’55).

Meanwhile, the other team in Chicago, the Cardinals, also re-emphasized the run. The Cardinals were a bad team in ’54 and future Packer Lamar McHan threw 6 TDs against 22 interceptions. But by ’56, McHan was playing better and Ollie Matson and Johnny Olszewski gave the team a strong rushing attack. The Cardinals ranked 2nd in points allowed and rush attempts, and finished with a 7-5 record, so I think their shift in philosophy was an offshoot of the team improving. The retirement of Otto Graham in Cleveland and the benching of Norm Van Brocklin in Los Angeles didn’t help the passing environment, either.

Of course, looking at offense tells only half of the story. The transformation occurring on the other side of the ball was perhaps more significant. In the early ’50s, most teams played a 5-2 defense. Players like Bill Willis in Cleveland, Les Bingaman in Detroit, Bucko Kilroy with the Eagles and the Rams’ Stan West were among the best defenders of their day — and all played a position known as middle guard, a nose tackle/middle linebacker hybrid. But the 4-3 umbrella defense came of age in the mid-’50s, and it seems logical to assume that teams thought it would be easier to run against four-man lines. In particular, I think 1956 was the first year that the 4-3 defense became a staple in the NFL. But once teams realized that it was not any easier to run against this defense, offenses appeared to have decided to go back to the more balanced approach. That would also explain why the 1956 season was so run heavy.

Another possible explanation is that even back then, the NFL was a copycat league. The 1955 NFL champion was Cleveland, who finished 1st in rush attempts and last in pass attempts. Those ranks are Game Script-aided, of course, but I’m not sure that NFL coaches in 1956 were experts in advanced statistical analysis.

There’s no right answer, of course. I think all of these factors played a part — the decline in the quality of quarterback play, the invention of the umbrella defense, an influx of young running talent, and a realization that rushing was more effective probably all played a part. As a result, 1956 stands out on an island as one of the most unique seasons in NFL history.

  1. I have excluded the AFL statistics from this data set. []

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Tim Truemper February 25, 2014 at 3:57 pm

Fluke years are probably a result of multi-factor influences. The one’s you cited appear to make sense based on the data provided and the changes in scheme and personnel indicated. Landry introduced the 4-3 to the Giants as a player-coach partly in 1955 and the Giants won the NFL championship the following year. It appears that the Giants too went to a heavy run percentage from 1954 to 1956. Perhaps this was the Lombardi influence as the OC for the Giants at that time. He brought the Red Blaik mindset from his college days at Army in which execution in the running game and counter plays from the two and three back T formation were the norm. Insofar as QB play is concerned, it seems that a dropoff in QB performance may have occurred as they struggled to adapt to the defensive changes that occurred following the introduction of the 4-3. I am always astounded at the terrible TD to interception ratios for some of the QB’s of that era. Even Bob Waterfield, a HOF’er, had some bad years in which TD’s were single digits and int’s were double digits. I have not double checked but there were some bad ratio’s in the 1970′s too. The dropoff in the 1970′s probably merits and investigation, given the influence of such changes as the emphasis on zone pass defenses.

Reply

Richie February 25, 2014 at 5:04 pm

Top-10 worst TD-Int differentials:
Player Year Tm Att TD Int Diff Ratio
Bud Schwenk 1942 CRD 295 6 27 21 0.22
Terry Bradshaw* 1970 PIT 218 6 24 18 0.25
Ronnie Cahill 1943 CRD 109 3 21 18 0.14
Johnny Gildea 1935 PIT 105 2 20 18 0.10
Jim Plunkett 1972 NWE 355 8 25 17 0.32
Tobin Rote 1950 GNB 224 7 24 17 0.29
George Herring 1961 DEN 211 5 22 17 0.23
Johnny Lujack 1950 CHI 254 4 21 17 0.19
Hugh McCullough 1940 CRD 116 4 21 17 0.19
Bobby Thomason 1956 PHI 164 4 21 17 0.19

Top-10 Worst TD-Int Ratios:
Player Year Tm Att TD Int Diff Ratio
Pug Rentner 1935 BOS 50 1 15 14 0.07
Johnny Gildea 1935 PIT 105 2 20 18 0.10
Jim Ninowski 1960 DET 283 2 18 16 0.11
Whizzer White 1938 PIT 73 2 18 16 0.11
Joe Lillard 1933 CRD 67 2 16 14 0.13
Warren Heller 1934 PIT 112 2 15 13 0.13
Ryan Leaf 1998 SDG 245 2 15 13 0.13
Dean McAdams 1942 BKN 89 2 15 13 0.13
Sam Vacanti 1948 2TM 116 2 15 13 0.13
Ronnie Cahill 1943 CRD 109 3 21 18 0.14

Check out Pug Rentner (30%), Whizzer White (25%) and Joe Lillard’s (24%) interception percentages!

Reply

Richie February 25, 2014 at 5:06 pm

…and top-10 worst ratios since the merger:

Player Year Tm Att TD Int Diff Ratio
Ryan Leaf 1998 SDG 245 2 15 13 0.13
Joe Kapp 1970 BOS 219 3 17 14 0.18
Mike Phipps 1975 CLE 313 4 19 15 0.21
Trent Dilfer 1995 TAM 415 4 18 14 0.22
Terry Bradshaw* 1970 PIT 218 6 24 18 0.25
Joe Namath* 1976 NYJ 230 4 16 12 0.25
John Hadl 1975 GNB 353 6 21 15 0.29
Dan Pastorini 1973 HOU 290 5 17 12 0.29
Vince Ferragamo 1985 BUF 287 5 17 12 0.29
Bob Avellini 1978 CHI 264 5 16 11 0.31

Reply

martin February 25, 2014 at 8:09 pm

Hey richie!

Vinny Testaverde 1988 season :13 td and 35 int

-22 td-int differential

Reply

Richie February 25, 2014 at 8:28 pm

I did my query by looking for guys with 15+ INTs and fewer than 10 TDs. Didn’t think anybody else would make the top 10!

Reply

Richie February 25, 2014 at 4:40 pm

con·com·i·tant

adjective

1. naturally accompanying or associated.

noun

1. a phenomenon that naturally accompanies or follows something.

Reply

Chase Stuart February 25, 2014 at 5:06 pm

Is this a good thing?

Reply

Richie February 25, 2014 at 5:06 pm

I had never heard of that word, so had to look it up. Thought I’d share with anybody else who might be vocabulary-challenged. :)

Reply

Chase Stuart February 25, 2014 at 5:47 pm

Ah, okay!

Reply

Tim Truemper February 25, 2014 at 8:07 pm

Richie’s post was concomitant to mine

Reply

Richie February 25, 2014 at 8:28 pm

Dangit, now I have to look it up again!

Reply

martin February 25, 2014 at 8:12 pm

Hey Richie!

Vinny Testaverde 1988 season : 13 td 35 int

-22 td-int differential

Reply

Victor February 26, 2014 at 1:17 am

Had the pleasure of watching A Football Life: The Forward Pass last week. (I’m NFL network deprived unless I’m traveling.) I consider this analysis of a few important years concomitant to the historical breadth offered by that program. (H/T to Richie)

Reply

Tim Truemper February 28, 2014 at 4:35 pm

To Victor’s point I saw that same documentary and was a bit disappointed in some of its historical inaccurices. It promoted that the NFL was a run first league compared to the AFL. But there were some very pass heavy teams such as the NY Giants of 1961 thru 1963 (Tittle had back to back years of 30+ TD passes). Also, it neglected the 1970 to 1976 era of low passing and did not emphasize the rule changes starting in 1978 that led to a signficant increase in passing.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <strong> <em> <pre> <code> <a href="" title="">