<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Browns &#8211; FootballPerspective.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/tag/browns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:10:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Browns Are Favored on Thursday Night Football</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-browns-are-favored-on-thursday-night-football/</link>
					<comments>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-browns-are-favored-on-thursday-night-football/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkdowns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=39430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stop the presses: Cleveland is a favorite this week. The Browns host the Jets on Thursday night, and as of Tuesday evening, are 3-point favorites. That is breaking news, and it would really be breaking news if the Browns won. The 2015, 2016, and 2017 seasons, along with the first two games of 2018, give [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop the presses: Cleveland is a favorite this week. The Browns host the Jets on Thursday night, and as of Tuesday evening, are 3-point favorites. That is breaking news, and it would <em>really</em> be breaking news if the Browns won. The 2015, 2016, and 2017 seasons, along with the first two games of 2018, give us a nice 50-game sample for Cleveland. And over the team&#8217;s last 50 games, they have been favored just four times, and won only <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201512130cle.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">one of those games</a>: a win over the <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GabbBl00.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Blaine Gabbert</a>/<a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/TomsJi0.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jim Tomsula</a> 49ers.</p>
<p>On that day, <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/ManzJo00.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Johnny Manziel</a> was the team&#8217;s quarterback.  So yeah, it&#8217;s been a long time.  Of course, the Browns have only won 4 (and <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201809090cle.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tied a fifth</a>, of course) of those games, with the last coming back on <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201612240cle.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">December 24th, 2016</a>.  That day, <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GrifRo01.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Robert Griffin III</a> was the team&#8217;s quarterback.</p>
<p>So yes, it&#8217;s been a rough few years&#8230; or decade&#8230; or <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/the-new-browns-are-still-the-worst-expansion-team-ever/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">two decades</a>, for Cleveland.  Over the team&#8217;s last 58 games, the Browns have been favored to win and actually won just one time &#8212; that game against the 49ers.  There have been a lot of bad days in Cleveland over the years, of course: the graph below shows each Browns game since 2008, along with the pre-game point spread.  Remember, a positive number means the team was the <em>underdog</em>.  In the graph below, you can see that most of the dots are above the 0 line, meaning Cleveland was usually an underdog.   The games that Cleveland won are in white dots with orange borders; the games that Cleveland lost are in brown dots with orange borders.</p>
<a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/browns-fav2.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-39434" src="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/browns-fav2.png" alt="" width="616" height="386" srcset="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/browns-fav2.png 616w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/browns-fav2-300x188.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 616px) 100vw, 616px" /></a>
<p>Do the Browns have a reason to be optimistic since the game is at home and the Jets will have to travel to Ohio on short rest? From 2012 to 2017, there were 87 games played on Thursday night excluding week 1, when both teams have equal rest. In those games, the home team won 49 times (a 0.563 winning percentage), although the home team was favored 52 times and a pick&#8217;em once. Of the 52 home teams that were favored, 37 won (0.711) and 28 covered (with 24 failing to cover). When the spread has been tight &#8212; the home team favored by between 1 and 3 points &#8212; the home team has won 9 of 16 games.</p>
<p>If the Browns manage to win the game, it will be just the second time Cleveland has been favored to &#8212; and actually won &#8212; a game in <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tgl_finder.cgi?request=1&amp;match=game&amp;year_min=1940&amp;year_max=2018&amp;game_type=R&amp;game_num_min=0&amp;game_num_max=99&amp;week_num_min=0&amp;week_num_max=99&amp;game_time=late&amp;temperature_gtlt=lt&amp;game_result=W&amp;team_id=cle&amp;c1stat=vegas_line&amp;c1comp=lte&amp;c1val=0&amp;c2val=0&amp;c5val=1.0&amp;order_by=game_date" target="_blank" rel="noopener">primetime</a>.  The <em>second</em>-to-last time the Browns won a primetime game they were favored to win? They did it against a team that doesn&#8217;t exist anymore, with <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/BeliBi0.htm">Bill Belichick</a> as the head coach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-browns-are-favored-on-thursday-night-football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Browns Defy Regression To The Mean and Remain Terrible Against The Spread</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-browns-defy-regression-to-the-mean-and-remain-terrible-against-the-spread/</link>
					<comments>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-browns-defy-regression-to-the-mean-and-remain-terrible-against-the-spread/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 01:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=36445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last year, when the Browns were 0-14, I noted that Cleveland was also a pitiful 2-12 against the spread. The worst mark against the spread in a 16-game season was 3-13, which Cleveland managed to avoid. The Browns beat the Chargers (and the spread) in week 16, and then pushed in a 3-point loss in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/browns-continue-to-lose-against-the-spread-too/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Last year</a>, when the Browns were 0-14, I noted that Cleveland was also a pitiful 2-12 against the spread.  The worst mark against the spread in a 16-game season was 3-13, which Cleveland managed to avoid.  The Browns beat the Chargers (and the spread) in week 16, and then pushed in a 3-point loss in the season finale against, of course, Pittsburgh. </p>
<p>But guess what? After falling to the Bears today, 20-3, the Browns are now 3-12 against the spread (the second worst team is the Broncos, who are 4-10-1).  And for the <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tgl_finder.cgi?request=1&#038;match=game&#038;year_min=1999&#038;year_max=2017&#038;game_type=R&#038;game_num_min=16&#038;game_num_max=16&#038;week_num_min=0&#038;week_num_max=99&#038;temperature_gtlt=lt&#038;team_id=cle&#038;c5val=1.0&#038;order_by=game_date" rel="noopener" target="_blank">7th time in 8 years</a>, the Browns will again finish the season against the Steelers.</p>
<p>If you look at the teams that were 3-13 or 3-12-1 against the spread, they tend to do very well the next year.  In other words, Vegas perhaps hasn&#8217;t quite caught up to the fact that teams that perform terribly against the spread do much better the next year.</p>
<div align="center"> 
<table id="tablepress-2906" class="tablepress tablepress-id-2906">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1">
	<th class="column-1">Team</th><th class="column-2">Year</th><th class="column-3">Record ATS</th><th class="column-4">Win % ATS</th><th class="column-5">N+1 Record ATS</th><th class="column-6">N+1 Win % ATS</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-striping row-hover">
<tr class="row-2">
	<td class="column-1">TEN</td><td class="column-2">2014</td><td class="column-3">3-13-0</td><td class="column-4">0.1875</td><td class="column-5">5-10-1</td><td class="column-6">0.34375</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3">
	<td class="column-1">BAL</td><td class="column-2">2007</td><td class="column-3">3-13-0</td><td class="column-4">0.1875</td><td class="column-5">12-4-0</td><td class="column-6">0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4">
	<td class="column-1">NWE</td><td class="column-2">1981</td><td class="column-3">3-13-0</td><td class="column-4">0.1875</td><td class="column-5">6-3-0</td><td class="column-6">0.667</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5">
	<td class="column-1">PIT</td><td class="column-2">1980</td><td class="column-3">3-13-0</td><td class="column-4">0.1875</td><td class="column-5">8-8-0</td><td class="column-6">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6">
	<td class="column-1">CIN</td><td class="column-2">1987</td><td class="column-3">3-12-0</td><td class="column-4">0.2</td><td class="column-5">11-5-0</td><td class="column-6">0.6875</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7">
	<td class="column-1">STL</td><td class="column-2">2011</td><td class="column-3">3-12-1</td><td class="column-4">0.21875</td><td class="column-5">11-5-0</td><td class="column-6">0.6875</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-8">
	<td class="column-1">NYG</td><td class="column-2">2003</td><td class="column-3">3-12-1</td><td class="column-4">0.21875</td><td class="column-5">8-8-0</td><td class="column-6">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-9">
	<td class="column-1">OAK</td><td class="column-2">2003</td><td class="column-3">3-12-1</td><td class="column-4">0.21875</td><td class="column-5">6-10-0</td><td class="column-6">0.375</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-10">
	<td class="column-1">DAL</td><td class="column-2">1997</td><td class="column-3">3-12-1</td><td class="column-4">0.21875</td><td class="column-5">8-7-1</td><td class="column-6">0.53125</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-11">
	<td class="column-1">HOU</td><td class="column-2">1994</td><td class="column-3">3-12-1</td><td class="column-4">0.21875</td><td class="column-5">11-5-0</td><td class="column-6">0.6875</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-12">
	<td class="column-1">BAL</td><td class="column-2">1981</td><td class="column-3">3-12-1</td><td class="column-4">0.21875</td><td class="column-5">4-5-0</td><td class="column-6">0.444</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-13">
	<td class="column-1">SFO</td><td class="column-2">1978</td><td class="column-3">3-12-1</td><td class="column-4">0.21875</td><td class="column-5">7-8-1</td><td class="column-6">0.46875</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-14">
	<td class="column-1">Average</td><td class="column-2"></td><td class="column-3">3-12.3-0.6</td><td class="column-4">0.207</td><td class="column-5">8.1-6.5-0.3</td><td class="column-6">0.554</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<!-- #tablepress-2906 from cache --> </div>
<p>But then you have&#8230; the Browns.  Cleveland is now 6-24-1 against the spread since the start of last season, ensuring they will finish with the worst mark since 1978 over a 2-year period.  The 2014-2015 Titans were the previous record-holder, at 8-23-1 against the spread, followed by the 2008-2009 Jaguars (9-23-0) and four teams at 9-22-1 (&#8217;03-&#8217;04 Raiders, 2007-2008 Broncos, 1990-1991 Rams, and well, the 2015-2016 Browns).</p>
<p>So not only has Cleveland been historically bad on the field this year, they have been historically bad against the spread for the second year in a row. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-browns-defy-regression-to-the-mean-and-remain-terrible-against-the-spread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
