<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Implied SRS Ratings for NFL in 2017	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/#comment-328070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=34902#comment-328070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/#comment-328069&quot;&gt;Richie&lt;/a&gt;.

Agreed. That team belongs in San Diego...it&#039;s part of the whole vibe down there, not sure how that thing got screwed up. I&#039;m a fan of the history of the league, and for selfish reasons having nothing to do with how profitable teams are, I like the older, more historic teams to stay put.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/#comment-328069">Richie</a>.</p>
<p>Agreed. That team belongs in San Diego&#8230;it&#8217;s part of the whole vibe down there, not sure how that thing got screwed up. I&#8217;m a fan of the history of the league, and for selfish reasons having nothing to do with how profitable teams are, I like the older, more historic teams to stay put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richie		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/#comment-328069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=34902#comment-328069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/#comment-328062&quot;&gt;Tom&lt;/a&gt;.

I heard that attendance was bad for the preseason game. I hope that the Chargers fail horrifically in building a fan base here. They never should have left San Diego. 

However, I love the idea of the intimate stadium and could see that becoming a trend, since the NFL is mainly a TV sport anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/implied-srs-ratings-for-nfl-in-2017/#comment-328062">Tom</a>.</p>
<p>I heard that attendance was bad for the preseason game. I hope that the Chargers fail horrifically in building a fan base here. They never should have left San Diego. </p>
<p>However, I love the idea of the intimate stadium and could see that becoming a trend, since the NFL is mainly a TV sport anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
