<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Guest Post: Support for Manning, Brady, Brees, and Rodgers Part III	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 07:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Goodrich		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/#comment-326418</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Goodrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33133#comment-326418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/#comment-326364&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt;.

&#062;I thought it was pretty obvious that I was referencing the aspects of QB support covered in this article

Given that a number of people seem to have reached conclusions about overall QB support and, you know, the plain english meaning of the words you used, it was far from obvious.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/#comment-326364">Adam</a>.</p>
<p>&gt;I thought it was pretty obvious that I was referencing the aspects of QB support covered in this article</p>
<p>Given that a number of people seem to have reached conclusions about overall QB support and, you know, the plain english meaning of the words you used, it was far from obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sacramento gold miners		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/#comment-326385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sacramento gold miners]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33133#comment-326385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/#comment-326378&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt;.

Only on a minuscule scale, I still see Brady with six rings, and a fantastic W/L record. And like Rodgers, he&#039;s played in worse conditions than Manning or Brees. My rankings of these four choices would be Brady, Manning, Rodgers, and Brees.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers-part-iii/#comment-326378">Adam</a>.</p>
<p>Only on a minuscule scale, I still see Brady with six rings, and a fantastic W/L record. And like Rodgers, he&#8217;s played in worse conditions than Manning or Brees. My rankings of these four choices would be Brady, Manning, Rodgers, and Brees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
