<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Week Three College Football Ratings (2014)	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-three-college-football-ratings-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-three-college-football-ratings-2014/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bryan Frye		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-three-college-football-ratings-2014/#comment-164864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Frye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=21693#comment-164864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think it would be too hard to set up an Elo system in Excel with all if the NCAA teams. I finally figured out a simple way to do it for the 32 pro teams, and it takes about 5 minutes to set up and another 5 to maintain each week. You could try to come up with approximate ratings for FCS teams, or you could just have a dummy variable (each FCS is a 1000 where 1500 is average).

I did one using FO&#039;s DAVE and last year&#039;s DVOA, and my results are really similar to 538&#039;s. I&#039;d be happy to share my personal methodology if you&#039;re interested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it would be too hard to set up an Elo system in Excel with all if the NCAA teams. I finally figured out a simple way to do it for the 32 pro teams, and it takes about 5 minutes to set up and another 5 to maintain each week. You could try to come up with approximate ratings for FCS teams, or you could just have a dummy variable (each FCS is a 1000 where 1500 is average).</p>
<p>I did one using FO&#8217;s DAVE and last year&#8217;s DVOA, and my results are really similar to 538&#8217;s. I&#8217;d be happy to share my personal methodology if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase Stuart		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-three-college-football-ratings-2014/#comment-164121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=21693#comment-164121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/week-three-college-football-ratings-2014/#comment-164027&quot;&gt;Ty&lt;/a&gt;.

Last year, NDSU had an SRS rating of 45: http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/

They beat Iowa State (rating of 35) by 20 in Ames, which is a single-game rating of 58.  

At this point, they would seem to be a top 40 team on paper, and maybe a top 50 team overall.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-three-college-football-ratings-2014/#comment-164027">Ty</a>.</p>
<p>Last year, NDSU had an SRS rating of 45: <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/" rel="ugc">http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/</a></p>
<p>They beat Iowa State (rating of 35) by 20 in Ames, which is a single-game rating of 58.  </p>
<p>At this point, they would seem to be a top 40 team on paper, and maybe a top 50 team overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
