<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Week Fourteen NCAA SRS Rankings: Alabama Finishes #1	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-fourteen-ncaa-srs-rankings-alabama-finishes-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-fourteen-ncaa-srs-rankings-alabama-finishes-1/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken Adams		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-fourteen-ncaa-srs-rankings-alabama-finishes-1/#comment-320705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Adams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=31436#comment-320705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Removing two of the worst Big Ten teams or comparing the conferences rank-to-rank biases the Big Ten/Pac-12 comparison in the other direction. One way Sagarin compares conferences is to use a 1, 2, 3...n/2...3, 2, 1 weighting. If we use that, we get 44.5 weighted average for the P12 and 43.1 for the B10. Another way would be to remove the two middle-ranked teams in the B10--in this case Nebraska and Northwestern--or remove the top and bottom teams (Ohio State and Rutgers) and then taking a simple average. Doing that doesn&#039;t change the picture much.

It&#039;s always tough to determine conference strength, but it seems hard to conclude that the B10 was an overall better conference than the P12 this year (based on SRS).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing two of the worst Big Ten teams or comparing the conferences rank-to-rank biases the Big Ten/Pac-12 comparison in the other direction. One way Sagarin compares conferences is to use a 1, 2, 3&#8230;n/2&#8230;3, 2, 1 weighting. If we use that, we get 44.5 weighted average for the P12 and 43.1 for the B10. Another way would be to remove the two middle-ranked teams in the B10&#8211;in this case Nebraska and Northwestern&#8211;or remove the top and bottom teams (Ohio State and Rutgers) and then taking a simple average. Doing that doesn&#8217;t change the picture much.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always tough to determine conference strength, but it seems hard to conclude that the B10 was an overall better conference than the P12 this year (based on SRS).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
