<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Week Eleven (2016) College Football Ratings: Chaos, Chaos, Chaos	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: WR		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/#comment-320346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=31240#comment-320346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/#comment-320321&quot;&gt;Chase&lt;/a&gt;.

Interesting that SRS likes the big ten and pac-12 so much, and that teams like Clemson and Louisville are doing well by strength of record.  ESPN people have been criticizing the ACC teams for playing weak schedules and narrowly winning games all year.  It reminds me of the treatment Florida State got from the Worldwide Leader two years ago.  I&#039;m still baffled as to how Texas A&#038;M was ranked in the top 4 a couple weeks ago, when they have only beaten one ranked team all season.  If I had a vote, my top 4 would be Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, and either Clemson or Louisville.  It&#039;ll be interesting to see how closely that matches the committee&#039;s choices tomorrow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/#comment-320321">Chase</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting that SRS likes the big ten and pac-12 so much, and that teams like Clemson and Louisville are doing well by strength of record.  ESPN people have been criticizing the ACC teams for playing weak schedules and narrowly winning games all year.  It reminds me of the treatment Florida State got from the Worldwide Leader two years ago.  I&#8217;m still baffled as to how Texas A&amp;M was ranked in the top 4 a couple weeks ago, when they have only beaten one ranked team all season.  If I had a vote, my top 4 would be Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, and either Clemson or Louisville.  It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how closely that matches the committee&#8217;s choices tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anders		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/#comment-320342</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=31240#comment-320342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/#comment-320321&quot;&gt;Chase&lt;/a&gt;.

It would be fun to see how it would change of one changed grin average top 25 to average top 4]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2016-college-football-ratings-chaos-chaos-chaos/#comment-320321">Chase</a>.</p>
<p>It would be fun to see how it would change of one changed grin average top 25 to average top 4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
