<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Week Eleven (2014) College Football SRS Ratings: Playoff Picture Emerges	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2014-college-football-srs-ratings-playoff-picture-emerges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2014-college-football-srs-ratings-playoff-picture-emerges/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mrh		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2014-college-football-srs-ratings-playoff-picture-emerges/#comment-232353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=22625#comment-232353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At least there is some historical and regional justification for playing SMU.  And NW St is nearby anyhow.  But Buffalo?  C&#039;mon man.  This is a good chance for the committee to show that playing weak non-conference games, even in-state, old rivals, doesn&#039;t get you to the Final Four.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least there is some historical and regional justification for playing SMU.  And NW St is nearby anyhow.  But Buffalo?  C&#8217;mon man.  This is a good chance for the committee to show that playing weak non-conference games, even in-state, old rivals, doesn&#8217;t get you to the Final Four.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: prowrestlingisstrong		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-eleven-2014-college-football-srs-ratings-playoff-picture-emerges/#comment-230531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prowrestlingisstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=22625#comment-230531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ultimately if both Baylor and TCU go undefeated the rest of the way you have to look at Baylors embarrassing non conference slate as a tie breaker for TCU.

Buffalo,  SMU and Northwestern State should not cut it for a power conference team.  TCU at least pummeled an average to slightly above average Minnesota team. Hell they even have a bigger win over common non conference opponent SMU. 

The committee should not reward teams that load up the non conference portion of their schedule with easy wins. Its a bad precedent to set going forwatd]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately if both Baylor and TCU go undefeated the rest of the way you have to look at Baylors embarrassing non conference slate as a tie breaker for TCU.</p>
<p>Buffalo,  SMU and Northwestern State should not cut it for a power conference team.  TCU at least pummeled an average to slightly above average Minnesota team. Hell they even have a bigger win over common non conference opponent SMU. </p>
<p>The committee should not reward teams that load up the non conference portion of their schedule with easy wins. Its a bad precedent to set going forwatd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
