<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Week 9 Game Scripts and Average Field Position Data	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase Stuart		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/#comment-55931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=15053#comment-55931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/#comment-55927&quot;&gt;Arif Hasan&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks.  That is pretty interesting. I may try to do something with this later!  I guess the results make sense: the Jets game script is not very good, but teams don&#039;t really run against them.  Meanwhile, the 49ers see a lot of runs, and they have a high positive game script.  You wouldn&#039;t expect that, because of the reputation as having such a dominant rush D.  Food for thought, I suppose.

To make it pretty, wrap it in tags like this (but don&#039;t include the number 1, obviously):

&lt;1p1r1e1&gt; text &lt;1/1p1r1e1&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/#comment-55927">Arif Hasan</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks.  That is pretty interesting. I may try to do something with this later!  I guess the results make sense: the Jets game script is not very good, but teams don&#8217;t really run against them.  Meanwhile, the 49ers see a lot of runs, and they have a high positive game script.  You wouldn&#8217;t expect that, because of the reputation as having such a dominant rush D.  Food for thought, I suppose.</p>
<p>To make it pretty, wrap it in tags like this (but don&#8217;t include the number 1, obviously):</p>
<p>&lt;1p1r1e1> text &lt;1/1p1r1e1></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase Stuart		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/#comment-55929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=15053#comment-55929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/#comment-55925&quot;&gt;Arif Hasan&lt;/a&gt;.

No worries about prattling; glad you dig game scripts!

The &#039;72 Patriots were quite horrible, as detailed here: http://www.footballperspective.com/jacksonville-at-denver-a-preview/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/week-9-game-scripts-and-average-field-position-data/#comment-55925">Arif Hasan</a>.</p>
<p>No worries about prattling; glad you dig game scripts!</p>
<p>The &#8217;72 Patriots were quite horrible, as detailed here: <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/jacksonville-at-denver-a-preview/" rel="ugc">http://www.footballperspective.com/jacksonville-at-denver-a-preview/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
