<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Two Field Goals Are Better Than One Touchdown Despite #Math	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/two-field-goals-are-better-than-one-touchdown-despite-math/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/two-field-goals-are-better-than-one-touchdown-despite-math/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 03:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richie		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/two-field-goals-are-better-than-one-touchdown-despite-math/#comment-332070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=37090#comment-332070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the biggest factor here is a strategy decision.  If we eliminate all the games where the opponent scored 22+ points (a proxy for a blowout), then the 13-point teams win 42.2% of their games and the 14-point teams win 37.1% of their games.  This is a 5 percentage point difference, compared to the 8 percentage point difference for all games.

Another way to look at it: the 13-point teams allow 21 or fewer points 64% of the time, while the 14-point teams allow 21 or fewer points 49% of the time.  

It seems like the distribution of points allowed shouldn&#039;t be that much different for a team that scores 13 or 14 points, but it is.  It works out to something like a 160-game difference.   And that would make sense.  If a team is trailing 28-7, they are much less likely to settle for field goals in the second half.  Instead, they score the TD to get them to 14 points.  Teams that are at 13 points (or get to 13 points) more likely got there because the game was close and attempting those field goals did more to increase win probability.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the biggest factor here is a strategy decision.  If we eliminate all the games where the opponent scored 22+ points (a proxy for a blowout), then the 13-point teams win 42.2% of their games and the 14-point teams win 37.1% of their games.  This is a 5 percentage point difference, compared to the 8 percentage point difference for all games.</p>
<p>Another way to look at it: the 13-point teams allow 21 or fewer points 64% of the time, while the 14-point teams allow 21 or fewer points 49% of the time.  </p>
<p>It seems like the distribution of points allowed shouldn&#8217;t be that much different for a team that scores 13 or 14 points, but it is.  It works out to something like a 160-game difference.   And that would make sense.  If a team is trailing 28-7, they are much less likely to settle for field goals in the second half.  Instead, they score the TD to get them to 14 points.  Teams that are at 13 points (or get to 13 points) more likely got there because the game was close and attempting those field goals did more to increase win probability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LightsOut85		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/two-field-goals-are-better-than-one-touchdown-despite-math/#comment-332069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LightsOut85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=37090#comment-332069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The deeper I was into reading this article, and then the comments, the more interesting things got. Seeing some bare bones &quot;weird stats&quot; flesh themselves out. Forming my own ideas (&#038; seeing others having similar ones, once I hit the comments), seeing different theories coming together &#038; put to the test.  Very, very cool stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deeper I was into reading this article, and then the comments, the more interesting things got. Seeing some bare bones &#8220;weird stats&#8221; flesh themselves out. Forming my own ideas (&amp; seeing others having similar ones, once I hit the comments), seeing different theories coming together &amp; put to the test.  Very, very cool stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
