<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: True Receiving Yards, Part I	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/true-receiving-yards-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/true-receiving-yards-part-i/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/true-receiving-yards-part-i/#comment-36488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=13067#comment-36488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So what is the final calculations?  Do we drop the team adjustments?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is the final calculations?  Do we drop the team adjustments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neil Paine		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/true-receiving-yards-part-i/#comment-36335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 03:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=13067#comment-36335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One final experiment for me on the matter...

I took the same sample of players I used for my year-to-year study, and I re-ran the same experiment as before, except I used in-season splits instead of back-to-back seasons. Specifically, I used the ratio of team dropbacks in odd-numbered games to dropbacks in even-numbered games to try to predict the change in ACY from even to odd-numbered games.

The regression once again had a very low R^2 but a significant coefficient on expected change in ACY, and that coefficient was 0.779!

So it&#039;s all over the place. I think Chase&#039;s 50% number is probably the best bet, if not simply because it splits the difference between all of the different results we&#039;ve seen, and it&#039;s pretty convenient. I&#039;d be willing to settle on that as the &quot;official&quot; discount rate on team dropbacks vs league dropbacks in the TRY formula.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One final experiment for me on the matter&#8230;</p>
<p>I took the same sample of players I used for my year-to-year study, and I re-ran the same experiment as before, except I used in-season splits instead of back-to-back seasons. Specifically, I used the ratio of team dropbacks in odd-numbered games to dropbacks in even-numbered games to try to predict the change in ACY from even to odd-numbered games.</p>
<p>The regression once again had a very low R^2 but a significant coefficient on expected change in ACY, and that coefficient was 0.779!</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s all over the place. I think Chase&#8217;s 50% number is probably the best bet, if not simply because it splits the difference between all of the different results we&#8217;ve seen, and it&#8217;s pretty convenient. I&#8217;d be willing to settle on that as the &#8220;official&#8221; discount rate on team dropbacks vs league dropbacks in the TRY formula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
