<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Jets, And Draft Capital Spent On QBs Since 2009	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jets-and-draft-capital-spent-on-qbs-since-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jets-and-draft-capital-spent-on-qbs-since-2009/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Quinton White		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jets-and-draft-capital-spent-on-qbs-since-2009/#comment-324828</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quinton White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=32706#comment-324828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Really late on this but I believe if you had performed a similar exercise for the years 2004-2009, the Jaguars would have spent 0 draft capital on QBs. As a Jags fan, I often think their current rut is a direct result of that drought. Similar to Richie&#039;s thought, rather than being able to truly grade QBs, by 2010 the Jaguars were in a desperate position where they had to draft one. Ex-post, Gabbert obviously looks terrible but at the time the Jags were widely praised for aggressively moving up to get him. Bortles was more of a reach but it has since come out that he was unlikely to get out of the top-ten. I am glad my job does not require betting on 20 year olds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really late on this but I believe if you had performed a similar exercise for the years 2004-2009, the Jaguars would have spent 0 draft capital on QBs. As a Jags fan, I often think their current rut is a direct result of that drought. Similar to Richie&#8217;s thought, rather than being able to truly grade QBs, by 2010 the Jaguars were in a desperate position where they had to draft one. Ex-post, Gabbert obviously looks terrible but at the time the Jags were widely praised for aggressively moving up to get him. Bortles was more of a reach but it has since come out that he was unlikely to get out of the top-ten. I am glad my job does not require betting on 20 year olds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sacramento gold miners		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jets-and-draft-capital-spent-on-qbs-since-2009/#comment-324659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sacramento gold miners]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=32706#comment-324659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jets-and-draft-capital-spent-on-qbs-since-2009/#comment-324651&quot;&gt;Richie&lt;/a&gt;.

College QBs are also overdrafted on a consistent basis, and I predict it will happen again this year. Some of the highly touted QBs who failed never faced any adversity until they reached the pros, and couldn&#039;t handle failure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jets-and-draft-capital-spent-on-qbs-since-2009/#comment-324651">Richie</a>.</p>
<p>College QBs are also overdrafted on a consistent basis, and I predict it will happen again this year. Some of the highly touted QBs who failed never faced any adversity until they reached the pros, and couldn&#8217;t handle failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
