<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The 2013 Panthers are so attractive Bill Parcells could be lured out of retirement	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/the-2013-panthers-are-so-attractive-bill-parcells-could-be-lured-out-of-retirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-2013-panthers-are-so-attractive-bill-parcells-could-be-lured-out-of-retirement/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 09:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: kipayas.com		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-2013-panthers-are-so-attractive-bill-parcells-could-be-lured-out-of-retirement/#comment-85369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kipayas.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 09:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=4952#comment-85369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It helps it be the first choice in the users and the most wanted 
and comfortable P2P torrent engine ever produced in the world.
Candle light vigils and protests were organized on Facebook and Twitter in support 
from the protestors, democracy along with the end on the bloodshed.
So, the website walks an extremely thin tightrope, legally speaking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It helps it be the first choice in the users and the most wanted<br />
and comfortable P2P torrent engine ever produced in the world.<br />
Candle light vigils and protests were organized on Facebook and Twitter in support<br />
from the protestors, democracy along with the end on the bloodshed.<br />
So, the website walks an extremely thin tightrope, legally speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-2013-panthers-are-so-attractive-bill-parcells-could-be-lured-out-of-retirement/#comment-4421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=4952#comment-4421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/the-2013-panthers-are-so-attractive-bill-parcells-could-be-lured-out-of-retirement/#comment-4405&quot;&gt;Lucas&lt;/a&gt;.

The point of the article wasn&#039;t to say they are good now, it was to say their turnaround potential is off the charts, and that a coach would jump at that opportunity. Obviously a 3-8 team it bottom 16, we don&#039;t need you to clarify that for us. He&#039;s saying the ability to bounce back (Bengals of 11, Colts of 12) is high for NEXT year (hence why he said 2013). And actually, this year their defense has been keeping them in games and their offense is struggling. That&#039;s why they&#039;re ranked higher in defense than in offense, something  this article pointed out. And I&#039;m going to have to side with them, stats are always better evidence than brilliant deductions of &quot;whats your blood alchohol content.&quot;

 So all in all, pretty worthless comment you made there. You sure you aren&#039;t drunk?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/the-2013-panthers-are-so-attractive-bill-parcells-could-be-lured-out-of-retirement/#comment-4405">Lucas</a>.</p>
<p>The point of the article wasn&#8217;t to say they are good now, it was to say their turnaround potential is off the charts, and that a coach would jump at that opportunity. Obviously a 3-8 team it bottom 16, we don&#8217;t need you to clarify that for us. He&#8217;s saying the ability to bounce back (Bengals of 11, Colts of 12) is high for NEXT year (hence why he said 2013). And actually, this year their defense has been keeping them in games and their offense is struggling. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re ranked higher in defense than in offense, something  this article pointed out. And I&#8217;m going to have to side with them, stats are always better evidence than brilliant deductions of &#8220;whats your blood alchohol content.&#8221;</p>
<p> So all in all, pretty worthless comment you made there. You sure you aren&#8217;t drunk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
