<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Redskins &#8211; FootballPerspective.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/tag/redskins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Kirk Cousins is Spreading It Around</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/kirk-cousins-is-spreading-it-around/</link>
					<comments>http://www.footballperspective.com/kirk-cousins-is-spreading-it-around/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkdowns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Cousins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redskins]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=35916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the summer, I wrote an article describing the increased emphasis on spreading the ball around in team passing games. Through nine weeks of the 2017 season, which teams have the most and least concentrated passing games? One way to measures this is to calculate the percentage of team targets had by every player on [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/teams-are-spreading-it-around-more-these-days/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">summer</a>, I wrote an article describing the increased emphasis on spreading the ball around in team passing games.  Through nine weeks of the 2017 season, which teams have the most and least concentrated passing games?</p>
<p>One way to measures this is to calculate the percentage of team targets had by every player on each team, square that result, and sum those squared results to get a team grade.  Let&#8217;s use the Steelers as an example.  Pittsburgh has 273 team targets this year, and star receiver <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BrowAn04.htm" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Antonio Brown</a> has seen 94, or 34%, of those targets.  The square of 34% is 11.9%; perform those calculations for every Steelers who has a target this year, and the sum of those squares is 19.6%.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/pit-spreading-it-around.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/pit-spreading-it-around.png" alt="" width="943" height="402" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-35917" srcset="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/pit-spreading-it-around.png 943w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/pit-spreading-it-around-300x128.png 300w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/pit-spreading-it-around-768x327.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 943px) 100vw, 943px" /></a></div>
<p> <span id="more-35916"></span></p>
<p>That 19.6% number is the highest in the NFL this season, at least through nine weeks. It&#8217;s followed by the Texans and Cowboys at 18%, as both Texas teams rely heavily on their star wide receivers, <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HopkDe00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">DeAndre  Hopkins</a> and <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BryaDe01.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Dez  Bryant</a>.  The Panthers, Bengals, and Dolphins are the next three teams, and all three have below-average passing games. I&#8217;m loathe to fault <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GreeA.00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">A.J.  Green</a> for Cincinnati&#8217;s struggles, but Carolina and Miami are putting huge target numbers on unproductive players: <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/L/LandJa00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Jarvis  Landry</a> leads the NFL in targets per game and ranks 4th in percentage of team targets despite averaging an anemic 7.7 yards per catch on a 64.4% catch rate.  <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/McCaCh01.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Christian  McCaffrey</a> has received 25% of all Panthers targets, but he&#8217;s only averaging 7.5 yards per reception (and has a 75.0% catch rate).</p>
<p>The five teams with the <em>least</em> concentrated passing games all have bad passing offenses: the 49ers, Giants, Bears, Ravens, and Browns.  The fact that those passing attacks have spread the football around may be more to do with injuries and poor receivers than design; I am sure the Giants would love to have instead thrown 90 passes to <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BeckOd00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Odell  Beckham</a> this year.  Cleveland, for example, ranks dead last in both concentration index and ANY/A this year: that&#8217;s because the Browns simply have nobody to throw it to.</p>
<p>The table below shows, for each passing attack, its number of targets, its concentration index, and its Relative ANY/A &#8212; that is, the amount of ANY/A above or below average.</p>
<div align="center"> 
<table id="tablepress-2860" class="tablepress tablepress-id-2860">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1">
	<th class="column-1">Rk</th><th class="column-2">Team</th><th class="column-3">Targets</th><th class="column-4">Conc Index</th><th class="column-5">RANY/A</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-striping row-hover">
<tr class="row-2">
	<td class="column-1">1</td><td class="column-2">PIT</td><td class="column-3">273</td><td class="column-4">19.6%</td><td class="column-5">+0.40</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3">
	<td class="column-1">2</td><td class="column-2">HOU</td><td class="column-3">259</td><td class="column-4">18.5%</td><td class="column-5">+0.35</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4">
	<td class="column-1">3</td><td class="column-2">DAL</td><td class="column-3">256</td><td class="column-4">18.1%</td><td class="column-5">+1.07</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5">
	<td class="column-1">4</td><td class="column-2">CAR</td><td class="column-3">285</td><td class="column-4">17.4%</td><td class="column-5">-1.15</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6">
	<td class="column-1">5</td><td class="column-2">CIN</td><td class="column-3">218</td><td class="column-4">16.8%</td><td class="column-5">-0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7">
	<td class="column-1">6</td><td class="column-2">MIA</td><td class="column-3">284</td><td class="column-4">16.8%</td><td class="column-5">-1.53</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-8">
	<td class="column-1">7</td><td class="column-2">MIN</td><td class="column-3">272</td><td class="column-4">16.1%</td><td class="column-5">+0.86</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-9">
	<td class="column-1">8</td><td class="column-2">TEN</td><td class="column-3">239</td><td class="column-4">16%</td><td class="column-5">-0.58</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-10">
	<td class="column-1">9</td><td class="column-2">NOR</td><td class="column-3">270</td><td class="column-4">15.9%</td><td class="column-5">+1.90</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-11">
	<td class="column-1">10</td><td class="column-2">PHI</td><td class="column-3">288</td><td class="column-4">15.6%</td><td class="column-5">+1.58</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-12">
	<td class="column-1">11</td><td class="column-2">NWE</td><td class="column-3">303</td><td class="column-4">15.2%</td><td class="column-5">+2.01</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-13">
	<td class="column-1">12</td><td class="column-2">TAM</td><td class="column-3">303</td><td class="column-4">15.2%</td><td class="column-5">+0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-14">
	<td class="column-1">13</td><td class="column-2">OAK</td><td class="column-3">310</td><td class="column-4">15.2%</td><td class="column-5">+0.27</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-15">
	<td class="column-1">14</td><td class="column-2">LAC</td><td class="column-3">277</td><td class="column-4">15.2%</td><td class="column-5">+0.53</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-16">
	<td class="column-1">15</td><td class="column-2">IND</td><td class="column-3">283</td><td class="column-4">15.1%</td><td class="column-5">-0.68</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-17">
	<td class="column-1">16</td><td class="column-2">SEA</td><td class="column-3">292</td><td class="column-4">14.9%</td><td class="column-5">+0.89</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-18">
	<td class="column-1">17</td><td class="column-2">ATL</td><td class="column-3">265</td><td class="column-4">14.8%</td><td class="column-5">+0.91</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-19">
	<td class="column-1">18</td><td class="column-2">DET</td><td class="column-3">299</td><td class="column-4">14.4%</td><td class="column-5">+0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-20">
	<td class="column-1">19</td><td class="column-2">LAR</td><td class="column-3">244</td><td class="column-4">14.4%</td><td class="column-5">+2.12</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-21">
	<td class="column-1">20</td><td class="column-2">KAN</td><td class="column-3">282</td><td class="column-4">14.3%</td><td class="column-5">+2.06</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-22">
	<td class="column-1">21</td><td class="column-2">JAX</td><td class="column-3">233</td><td class="column-4">14.3%</td><td class="column-5">+0.37</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-23">
	<td class="column-1">22</td><td class="column-2">GNB</td><td class="column-3">288</td><td class="column-4">13.9%</td><td class="column-5">-0.78</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-24">
	<td class="column-1">23</td><td class="column-2">NYJ</td><td class="column-3">268</td><td class="column-4">13.5%</td><td class="column-5">-0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-25">
	<td class="column-1">24</td><td class="column-2">ARI</td><td class="column-3">308</td><td class="column-4">13.3%</td><td class="column-5">-0.33</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-26">
	<td class="column-1">25</td><td class="column-2">DEN</td><td class="column-3">286</td><td class="column-4">13.2%</td><td class="column-5">-1.66</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-27">
	<td class="column-1">26</td><td class="column-2">WAS</td><td class="column-3">265</td><td class="column-4">13.1%</td><td class="column-5">+1.01</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-28">
	<td class="column-1">27</td><td class="column-2">BUF</td><td class="column-3">230</td><td class="column-4">12.9%</td><td class="column-5">+0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-29">
	<td class="column-1">28</td><td class="column-2">SFO</td><td class="column-3">361</td><td class="column-4">12.5%</td><td class="column-5">-1.70</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-30">
	<td class="column-1">29</td><td class="column-2">NYG</td><td class="column-3">295</td><td class="column-4">11.9%</td><td class="column-5">-0.74</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-31">
	<td class="column-1">30</td><td class="column-2">CHI</td><td class="column-3">220</td><td class="column-4">11.4%</td><td class="column-5">-1.43</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-32">
	<td class="column-1">31</td><td class="column-2">BAL</td><td class="column-3">302</td><td class="column-4">11%</td><td class="column-5">-2.22</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-33">
	<td class="column-1">32</td><td class="column-2">CLE</td><td class="column-3">303</td><td class="column-4">10.4%</td><td class="column-5">-2.91</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<!-- #tablepress-2860 from cache --> </div>
<p>The Browns are 32nd in ANY/A and 32nd in concentration index; the Ravens are 31st in ANY/A and 31st in concentration index.  There&#8217;s definitely a correlation between the two statistics (in fact, the correlation coefficient is 0.43, indicating a relatively strong positive connection), but there are also outliers.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CousKi00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Kirk  Cousins</a> and the Redskins are one.  Washington ranks 7th in ANY/A, but just 26th in concentration index, the only team in the top quarter of ANY/A and bottom quarter of concentration index (the Dolphins and Panthers are in the reverse categories).  Cousins has done an impressive job of spreading the football around: <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/ThomCh03.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Chris  Thompson</a> actually leads the team in targets with 46, but six other players (<a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CrowJa00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Jamison  Crowder</a>, <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PryoTe00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Terrelle  Pryor</a>, <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/ReedJo02.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Jordan  Reed</a>, <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GranRy01.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Ryan  Grant</a>, <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DaviVe00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Vernon  Davis</a>, and <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DoctJo00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Josh  Doctson</a>) have at least 22 targets. Washington has a top-8 passing attack with its leaders in receiving yards being a backup running back, a 33-year-old tight end, and Jamison  Crowder and Ryan  Grant.  Meanwhile, higher profile names like Pryor, Reed, and Doctson rank 5-6-7 on the team in receiving yards.</p>
<p>For <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GoffJa00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Jared  Goff</a> and the Rams, a similar story has unfolded.  Five players &#8212; WR <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WoodRo02.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Robert  Woods</a>, WR <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/K/KuppCo00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Cooper  Kupp</a>, RB <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GurlTo01.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Todd  Gurley</a>, WR <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WatkSa00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Sammy  Watkins</a>, and TE <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HigbTy00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Tyler  Higbee</a> &#8212; have between 29 and 49 targets, with no player having yet hit the 50-target threshold.  That arguably makes <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GoffJa00.htm" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Jared  Goff&#8217;s</a> work this year even more impressive.</p>
<p>And then there is <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/SmitAl03.htm" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Alex Smith</a> and the Chiefs.  On the surface, it might feel like everything in Kansas City is going through <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/K/KelcTr00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Travis  Kelce</a>, <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HillTy00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Tyreek  Hill</a>, or <a rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HuntKa00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-">Kareem  Hunt</a>.  And while those three have about two-thirds of the team&#8217;s receiving yards, they &#8220;only&#8221; have accounted for 58% of Kansas City targets.  That means 42% of the team&#8217;s passes are still going to the other, less-accomplished members of the Chiefs dominant passing attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballperspective.com/kirk-cousins-is-spreading-it-around/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictions in Review: NFC East</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-east/</link>
					<comments>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 04:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Stat Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions In Review 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redskins]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=20467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During the 2013 offseason, I wrote 32 articles under the RPO 2013 tag. In my Predictions in Review series, I review those preview articles with the benefit of hindsight. Previously, I reviewed the AFC West, the NFC West, the AFC South, the NFC South, the AFC North, the NFC North, and the AFC East. Today, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2013 offseason, I wrote 32 articles under the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/tag/rpo-2013/" target="_blank">RPO 2013</a> tag. In my <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/tag/predictions-in-review-2013/" target="_blank">Predictions in Review series</a>, I review those preview articles with the benefit of hindsight. Previously, I reviewed the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-afc-west/" target="_blank">AFC West</a>, the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-west/" target="_blank">NFC West</a>, the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-afc-south/" target="_blank">AFC South</a>, the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/" target="_blank">NFC South</a>, the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-afc-north/" target="_blank">AFC North</a>, the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-north/" target="_blank">NFC North</a>, and the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-afc-east/" target="_blank">AFC East</a>. Today, we finish the series with a look at the NFC East.</p>
<p><strong><a title="Permanent link to Eli  Manning was about as good in 2012 as he was in 2011" href="http://www.footballperspective.com/eli-manning-was-about-as-good-in-2012-as-he-was-in-2011/" target="_blank" rel="bookmark">Eli  Manning was about as good in 2012 as he was in 2011</a>, July 15, 2013</strong></p>
<p>On the surface, <a href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MannEl00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&amp;utm_source=direct&amp;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com" target="_blank">Eli Manning&#8217;s</a> numbers dropped significantly from 2011 to 2012; after further review, his &#8220;decline&#8221; was entirely due to two factors: attempting fewer passes and lower YAC by his receivers.  And since <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CruzVi00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Victor  Cruz</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/N/NickHa01.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Hakeem  Nicks</a> were largely responsible for those declines, it seemed fair to wonder how much of the blame should go to Manning.<span id="more-20467"></span></p>
<p>In addition, the Giants offense ranked 2nd in points per drive in 2012.  So it seemed like any question about Manning&#8217;s &#8220;decline&#8221; in 2012 was silly.  Of course, a year later, it&#8217;s the concept of defending Manning that seems silly.  In 2013, he led the league in interceptions and had the worst season of his career since his rookie year. His yards per attempt dropped to 6.9, and as his offensive line was decimated by injuries, his sack rate jumped to a career high 6.6%.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, in 2013, Manning averaged 7.43 average Air Yards per completed pass (6th in the NFL) and 4.62 YAC per completion (32nd).  In other words, YAC was still an issue for the 2013 Giants, which may explain the additions of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JennRa00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Rashad  Jennings</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/odell-beckham-jr-1.html?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Odell  Beckham, Jr</a>.</p>
<p><strong><a title="Permanent link to Which Passers Were Most Effective on Third Down in 2012?" href="http://www.footballperspective.com/which-passers-were-most-effective-on-third-down-in-2012/" target="_blank" rel="bookmark">Which Passers Were Most Effective on Third Down in 2012?</a>, July 23, 2013</strong></p>
<p>This post on <a href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GrifRo01.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&amp;utm_source=direct&amp;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com" target="_blank">Robert Griffin III</a> served as my Washington preview article.  In 2012, Washington&#8217;s offense was very successful, but Griffin really struggled when it came to converting first downs through the air.  It&#8217;s hard to remember, but Griffin was so good two years ago &#8211; he led the NFL in yards per pass attempt &#8212; that we were forced to resort to obscure stats to critique his game.  He did perform slightly below-average in obvious pass situations, and that showed up in his unimpressive third down numbers.</p>
<p>Last year? Well, everything seemed to go poorly for Griffin and Washington&#8230;. except <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/which-passers-were-most-effective-on-third-down-in-in-2013/" target="_blank">third down performance</a>. Griffin converted on 40.4% of his third down situations last season, and produced 7.4 more first downs than the average passer.  Perhaps that&#8217;s a silver lining in an otherwise miserable season, as Griffin&#8217;s ANY/A average dropped by two full yards.</p>
<p><strong><a title="Permanent link to Is change always good? The Cowboys move back to a 4-3 defense" href="http://www.footballperspective.com/is-change-always-good-the-cowboys-move-back-to-a-4-3-defense/" target="_blank" rel="bookmark">Is change always good? The Cowboys move back to a 4-3 defense</a>, August 22, 2013</strong></p>
<p>Spoiler: change is not always good. The Cowboys defense allowed a franchise- and league-high 6,645 yards last season.  Dallas ranked last in first downs allowed, and in the bottom three in passing yards, passing touchdowns, yards per carry, and points per drive.  Change is not always good. The only thing worse than the 2013 Cowboys defense may be the 2014 version, with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WareDe99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">DeMarcus  Ware</a> (Denver), <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HatcJa20.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Jason  Hatcher</a> (Washington), and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/L/LeexSe99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Sean  Lee</a> (IR).  Here&#8217;s the projected starting lineup:</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/SelvGe99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">George  Selvie</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MeltHe99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Henry  Melton</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HaydNi99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Nick  Hayden</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MincJe99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Jeremy  Mincey</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CartBr00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Bruce  Carter</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DuraJu99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Justin  Durant</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WilbKy00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Kyle  Wilber</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CarrBr99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Brandon  Carr</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WilcJ.00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">J.J.  Wilcox</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/ChurBa99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Barry  Church</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/ScanOr99.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Orlando  Scandrick</a></p>
<p>In other words, you want to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/fantasy-football-quarterback-by-committee-2014-fbg/" target="_blank">start your fantasy quarterbacks</a> against Dallas in 2014.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_4299" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Kelly-Carroll.jpg"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-4299" src="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Kelly-Carroll-300x199.jpg" alt="So the key is to grab Jim by the neck real quickly" width="300" height="199" class="size-medium wp-image-4299" srcset="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Kelly-Carroll-300x199.jpg 300w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Kelly-Carroll-1024x681.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a> <p id="caption-attachment-4299" class="wp-caption-text">So the key is to grab Jim by the neck real quickly.</p></div><strong><a title="Permanent link to Chip  Kell, Michael  Vick, and the Eagles Tempo" href="http://www.footballperspective.com/chip-kelly-michael-vick-and-the-eagles-tempo/" target="_blank" rel="bookmark">Chip  Kelly, Michael  Vick, and the Eagles Tempo</a>, September 2, 2013</strong></p>
<p>Right before the season, I provided an in-depth look at the Eagles performance in the preseason and other issues related to tempo.  At the time, we all thought <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/V/VickMi00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Michael Vick</a> was going to be the team&#8217;s quarterback: little did we know that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FoleNi00.htm?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-www.footballperspective.com">Nick  Foles</a> was about to have one of the greatest seasons in <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/who-is-the-best-backup-quarterback-ever/" target="_blank">backup quarterback history</a>.</p>
<p>Philadelphia wound up running just 1,054 plays last year, which placed the Eagles behind 12 other teams.  Does that mean the stories about Kelly and the team&#8217;s fast tempo were overblown? No.  One extenuating factor was that Foles led the NFL in ANY/A and <a href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/McCoLe01.htm" target="_blank">LeSean McCoy</a> averaged 5.1 yards per carry while leading the league in rushing yards.  Philadelphia finished 1st in the NFL in plays of <a href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/play_finder.cgi?request=1&#038;match=summary_all&#038;year_min=2013&#038;year_max=2013&#038;team_id=&#038;opp_id=&#038;game_type=R&#038;playoff_round=&#038;game_num_min=0&#038;game_num_max=99&#038;week_num_min=0&#038;week_num_max=99&#038;quarter=1&#038;quarter=2&#038;quarter=3&#038;quarter=4&#038;quarter=5&#038;tr_gtlt=lt&#038;minutes=15&#038;seconds=00&#038;down=0&#038;down=1&#038;down=2&#038;down=3&#038;down=4&#038;yds_to_go_min=&#038;yds_to_go_max=&#038;yg_gtlt=gt&#038;yards=20&#038;is_first_down=-1&#038;field_pos_min_field=team&#038;field_pos_min=&#038;field_pos_max_field=team&#038;field_pos_max=&#038;end_field_pos_min_field=team&#038;end_field_pos_min=&#038;end_field_pos_max_field=team&#038;end_field_pos_max=&#038;type=PASS&#038;type=RUSH&#038;is_turnover=-1&#038;turnover_type=interception&#038;turnover_type=fumble&#038;is_scoring=-1&#038;no_play=0&#038;game_day_of_week=&#038;game_location=&#038;game_result=&#038;margin_min=&#038;margin_max=&#038;order_by=yards" target="_blank">20+ yards</a> by an astonishing margin: the Eagles had 99 such plays, with the Broncos second with 77.  The Eagles also had the most 30+ yard plays and 40+ yards plays, and well, you get the point: it&#8217;s hard to accumulate plays when you know, you keep running into the end zone. </p>
<p>But Philadelphia ranked <em>dead last</em> in average minutes per drive according to <a href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2013/" target="_blank">Pro-Football-Reference.com</a>.  The Eagles also ranked 1st in the majority of the Pace Stats on <a href="http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats" target="_blank">Football Outsiders</a>, including seconds per play, seconds per play in the first half, seconds per play in close games, and seconds per play in neutral situations.</p>
<p>Philadelphia led the NFL in yards per play (6.33) and 32nd in number of seconds between plays.  I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s a pretty ringing endorsement for <a href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/KellCh0.htm" target="_blank">Chip Kelly&#8217;s</a> offense.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
