<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jaguars &#8211; FootballPerspective.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/tag/jaguars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:37:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Putting the 2017 Jaguars Pass Defense In Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/putting-the-2017-jaguars-pass-defense-in-perspective/</link>
					<comments>http://www.footballperspective.com/putting-the-2017-jaguars-pass-defense-in-perspective/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkdowns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguars]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=36329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Four years ago, I wrote an article about the &#8212; at the time &#8212; young and improving Seattle pass defense. It&#8217;s hard to compare modern defenses to what we saw in the &#8217;70s, as the game has changed significantly in the favor of more impressive passing numbers. But what we can do is compare each [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/putting-the-2013-seahawks-pass-defense-in-perspective/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Four years ago</a>, I wrote an article about the &#8212; <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/new-york-times-post-week-15-2013/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">at the time</a> &#8212; young and improving Seattle pass defense.  It&#8217;s hard to compare modern defenses to what we saw in the &#8217;70s, as the game has changed significantly in the favor of more impressive passing numbers.</p>
<p>But what we can do is compare each pass defense in each season to each other pass defense. In 2013, the Seahawks allowed 3.19 Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt, while the league average was 5.98.  That&#8217;s a difference of 2.79 ANY/A, and the standard deviation among the 32 pass defenses was 0.95 ANY/A.  In other words, the Seahawks were 2.93 standard deviations better than average (2.79 divided by 0.95).</p>
<p>This year, the Jaguars are allowing 3.52 ANY/A, and the league average is an almost identical 6.01.  So Jacksonville is 2.49 ANY/A better than average, and given the standard deviation of 0.94, it means the Jaguars pass defense has a Z-Score of 2.65.</p>
<p><strong>That would rank as the <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/putting-the-2013-seahawks-pass-defense-in-perspective/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">6th best since 1950</a>, behind the &#8217;02 Bucs, &#8217;88 Vikings, &#8217;70 VIkings, &#8217;13 Seahawks, and &#8217;82 Dolphins.  </strong>The 3.52 ANY/A average is the lowest since the 2013 Seahawks, and the second lowest since the 2009 Jets (who played in a less friendly passing environment; the league average was 5.74 ANY/A).</p>
<p>If you look at the <a href="http://pfref.com/pi/share/6TU22" rel="noopener" target="_blank">NFL passing statistics through 13 games</a> (well, 12 for the Dolphins and Patriots), it&#8217;s easy to see why the Jaguars pass defense is so good.  It&#8217;s because they&#8217;re great at literally everything.  The table below shows the team&#8217;s rank in every major category: top-5 finishes are in pink, and #1 finishes are in red with white font.<span id="more-36329"></span></p>
<a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jags-d.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jags-d-1024x722.png" alt="" width="1024" height="722" class="alignright size-large wp-image-36333" srcset="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jags-d-1024x722.png 1024w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jags-d-300x212.png 300w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jags-d-768x542.png 768w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jags-d.png 1562w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
<p>Jacksonville has a great pass rush: the defense ranks 1st in sacks, sack yards, and sack rate, with the Steelers second in all three categories.  Jacksonville leads 47-41, 305-294, and 9.9% to 9.0%.  The Jaguars have the <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tgl_finder.cgi?request=1&#038;match=single&#038;year_min=1970&#038;year_max=2017&#038;game_type=R&#038;game_num_min=0&#038;game_num_max=99&#038;week_num_min=0&#038;week_num_max=99&#038;temperature_gtlt=lt&#038;c5stat=pass_sacked_opp&#038;c5comp=gte&#038;c5val=.11&#038;c6stat=pass_att_opp&#038;order_by=game_date" rel="noopener" target="_blank">best sack rate in the NFL</a> since the 2008 Cowboys.</p>
<p>But when the Jaguars aren&#8217;t getting to the quarterback, they&#8217;re still doing really well.  Jacksonville ranks in the top three in both completion percentage and yards per completion, two metrics that often have inverse relationships. The Chiefs rank 1st in completion percentage but 31st in yards per completion; the Rams are 3rd in completion percentage and 19th in yards per completion. The Chargers are 2nd in yards per completion but 17th in completion percentage. And the Falcons are 1st in yards per completion but 27th in completion percentage.  Opposing offenses usually pick one method of moving the ball down the field (lots of short passes) or another (hitting on a number of big gains). It&#8217;s rare for a defense to stop both, but that&#8217;s what the Jaguars have done.  The Eagles are the only other defense to rank in the top 10 in both categories (8th in completion percentage, 10th in yards per completion), making Jacksonville&#8217;s top-3 rankings even more remarkable.</p>
<p>By being so good at stopping passes from being completed and at stopping completed passes for going for big gains, of course the Jaguars are first in the product of those two metrics: yards per attempt.  And given the team&#8217;s prowess at rushing the passer, the Jaguars are 0.7 net yards per attempt better than the next best team, San Diego (4.78 to 5.48).</p>
<p>And on top of that, the Jaguars rank 1st in passing yards, 2nd in passing touchdowns, and 2nd in interceptions.  Add it all up, and the Jaguars lead the league by a mile in ANY/A. Jacksonville is at 3.52 ANY/A, over a full yard better than the 2nd-place Chargers (4.56).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballperspective.com/putting-the-2017-jaguars-pass-defense-in-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Jaguars Are Maybe Really Good?</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jaguars-are-maybe-really-good/</link>
					<comments>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jaguars-are-maybe-really-good/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguars]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=35738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In games when they allow 10 or more points, the Jaguars are 0-3 so far this year. In games when they score fewer than 27 points, the Jaguars are 0-3 so far this year. If those stats sounds like those of a really bad team one month into an NFL season, well, you&#8217;re right. The [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In games when they allow 10 or more points, the Jaguars are 0-3 so far this year.</p>
<p>In games when they score fewer than 27 points, the Jaguars are 0-3 so far this year.</p>
<p>If those stats sounds like those of a really bad team one month into an NFL season, well, you&#8217;re right. The thing is, Jacksonville has played 7 games this year. Which means maybe they&#8217;re a really good team? Because in Jacksonville&#8217;s 4 non-losses &#8212; things commonly referred to in most parts of the country as wins &#8212; the average score has been Jacksonville 32.5, Opponent 5.75. The Jaguars four wins have come by 21+ points, the first team to record four such wins through seven games since 2007.</p>
<p><strong>Entering the 2017 season, the Jaguars had allowed fewer than 10 points in four out of their last 100 games. In 2017, the Jaguars have allowed fewer than 10 points in four out of seven games.</strong> The Jaguars had scored 27 or more points in just 13 of their last 100 games entering 2017; so far this year, they&#8217;ve scored 27 points in four out of seven games. So yeah, Jacksonville is suddenly a lot better than they used to be.</p>
<p>Jacksonville ranks 2nd in the NFL in points differential at +73. So&#8230; are the Jaguars actually good? Well, through seven weeks (but before Monday Night Football), Jacksonville also leads the NFL in Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt differential, which would have sounded impossible two months ago (especially if you knew <a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/RobiAl02.htm" target="_blank">Allen Robinson</a> would tear his ACL one catch into the season):<span id="more-35738"></span></p>
<a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/anya-diff.png"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-35743" src="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/anya-diff-1024x873.png" alt="" width="1024" height="873" srcset="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/anya-diff-1024x873.png 1024w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/anya-diff-300x256.png 300w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/anya-diff-768x655.png 768w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/anya-diff.png 1293w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
<p>So why are the Jaguars just 4-3 despite leading the NFL in ANY/A differential and ranking 2nd in points differential? Well, Jacksonville has not done a good job of being efficient with their scoring. In their four wins, the Jaguars won by 21, 22, 27, and 37 points. To win a game, of course, you only need to outscore your opponent by 1 point. That means Jacksonville scored 20, 21, 26, and 36 more points than they needed to in their four wins, or an average of 25.75 excess points per game.</p>
<p>In three losses, Jacksonville lost by 3, 10, and 21 points. So Jaguars opponents have scored 2, 9, and 20 excess points, or an average of 10.33 excess points per game.</p>
<p>If you compare those two numbers, it means Jacksonville is scoring 15.4 more excess points in wins than Jaguars opponents are in Jaguars losses. That&#8217;s the largest differential in the NFL through seven weeks (and, again, excluding Monday Night Football):</p>
<a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/excess-pts-thru-7.png"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-35745" src="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/excess-pts-thru-7-1024x1001.png" alt="" width="1024" height="1001" srcset="http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/excess-pts-thru-7-1024x1001.png 1024w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/excess-pts-thru-7-300x293.png 300w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/excess-pts-thru-7-768x751.png 768w, http://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/excess-pts-thru-7.png 1125w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
<p>So&#8230; even though Jacksonville is only 4-3, I think the Jaguars are maybe really good?</p>
<p>On the other side, you see the Dolphins (4-2), Cardinals (3-4), and Colts (2-5), three teams whose records far exceed their points differential.  And, of course, the Browns and 49ers are off of this list by virtue of having zero wins.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.footballperspective.com/the-jaguars-are-maybe-really-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
