<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SB XLVIII Is The Best Offense/Defense Super Bowl Ever	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: George		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/#comment-76272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=17591#comment-76272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/#comment-75794&quot;&gt;Kwash&lt;/a&gt;.

I totally know where you are coming from and I felt the same way, but using the Winston method I had them 10th offensively (about 2.61 points better than average), and I think pro-football reference had them about 7th or 8th at 2.7 points better than average doing it in an SRS style. I guess that&#039;s just down to life in the current NFC West where every game must be tough.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/#comment-75794">Kwash</a>.</p>
<p>I totally know where you are coming from and I felt the same way, but using the Winston method I had them 10th offensively (about 2.61 points better than average), and I think pro-football reference had them about 7th or 8th at 2.7 points better than average doing it in an SRS style. I guess that&#8217;s just down to life in the current NFC West where every game must be tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kwash		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/#comment-75794</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=17591#comment-75794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/#comment-75429&quot;&gt;George&lt;/a&gt;.

Sorry, but I don&#039;t see how anyone can trust a rating that has the Cardinals offense as a top-10 unit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/sb-xlviii-is-the-best-offensedefense-super-bowl-ever/#comment-75429">George</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry, but I don&#8217;t see how anyone can trust a rating that has the Cardinals offense as a top-10 unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
