<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Requesting Feedback: Thoughts on Stats and Game Scripts	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 18:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/#comment-312365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=27305#comment-312365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/#comment-312358&quot;&gt;Chase&lt;/a&gt;.

(I think you meant &quot;SRS is a better predictor of game score&quot; not Game Script correct?)  

I totally agree that GS is an incredible explanatory stat, especially when viewed side-by-side with the final score. I&#039;ll keep messing around with the data, maybe look at the previous two seasons you put together as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/#comment-312358">Chase</a>.</p>
<p>(I think you meant &#8220;SRS is a better predictor of game score&#8221; not Game Script correct?)  </p>
<p>I totally agree that GS is an incredible explanatory stat, especially when viewed side-by-side with the final score. I&#8217;ll keep messing around with the data, maybe look at the previous two seasons you put together as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/#comment-312358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=27305#comment-312358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/#comment-312350&quot;&gt;Tom&lt;/a&gt;.

My gut reaction is that SRS is a better predictor of Game Script than Game Script.  Now SRS isn&#039;t necessarily as good as Vegas, but I think Game Script is still better from an explanatory perspective than a predictive one.  On the other hand, nothing wrong with trial and error, and playing around with the data could yield some interesting results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/requesting-feedback-thoughts-on-stats-and-game-scripts/#comment-312350">Tom</a>.</p>
<p>My gut reaction is that SRS is a better predictor of Game Script than Game Script.  Now SRS isn&#8217;t necessarily as good as Vegas, but I think Game Script is still better from an explanatory perspective than a predictive one.  On the other hand, nothing wrong with trial and error, and playing around with the data could yield some interesting results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
