<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Random Perspective On: The 2012 Dallas Cowboys	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/random-perspective-on-the-2012-dallas-cowboys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/random-perspective-on-the-2012-dallas-cowboys/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2017 05:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Coyle		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/random-perspective-on-the-2012-dallas-cowboys/#comment-322753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Coyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2017 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=1206#comment-322753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article reminds me of when sportscasters try to make a name for themselves by a risky or controversial take. 

You lost nearly all credibility when you suggested LT was not as strong against the run and was not a noted run-stuffer. Seriously?! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jnNP7mWAP5k

You similarly lost credibility when you suggested LT had it &quot;easier&quot; bc of the era. He regularly faced triple-teams and beat them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_AbNLwQXn8

Last, if you had any credibility left to lose, you lost it when you suggested Ware was better in pass coverage. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2RsKNUCYMOw

LT also went to the pro-bowl when it mattered (before the whole thing became a joke bc of fan voting).

Sorry, Ware cannot touch the dominance LT displayed. It&#039;s not even close. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article reminds me of when sportscasters try to make a name for themselves by a risky or controversial take. </p>
<p>You lost nearly all credibility when you suggested LT was not as strong against the run and was not a noted run-stuffer. Seriously?! <a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jnNP7mWAP5k" rel="nofollow ugc">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jnNP7mWAP5k</a></p>
<p>You similarly lost credibility when you suggested LT had it &#8220;easier&#8221; bc of the era. He regularly faced triple-teams and beat them.<br />
<a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_AbNLwQXn8" rel="nofollow ugc">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_AbNLwQXn8</a></p>
<p>Last, if you had any credibility left to lose, you lost it when you suggested Ware was better in pass coverage. <a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2RsKNUCYMOw" rel="nofollow ugc">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2RsKNUCYMOw</a></p>
<p>LT also went to the pro-bowl when it mattered (before the whole thing became a joke bc of fan voting).</p>
<p>Sorry, Ware cannot touch the dominance LT displayed. It&#8217;s not even close. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/random-perspective-on-the-2012-dallas-cowboys/#comment-303826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=1206#comment-303826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/random-perspective-on-the-2012-dallas-cowboys/#comment-795&quot;&gt;Danish&lt;/a&gt;.

My calculations did include the 9.5 sacks he unofficially recorded as a rookie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/random-perspective-on-the-2012-dallas-cowboys/#comment-795">Danish</a>.</p>
<p>My calculations did include the 9.5 sacks he unofficially recorded as a rookie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
