<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rams/Colts Was the Least-Conforming Game of 2013	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/ramscolts-was-the-least-conforming-game-of-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/ramscolts-was-the-least-conforming-game-of-2013/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 23:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: George		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/ramscolts-was-the-least-conforming-game-of-2013/#comment-84886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 23:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18248#comment-84886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting stuff as usual. I&#039;ve started to work out things slightly differently, (I&#039;ve figured you can do the Winston model, and have it solve for individual home field advantages, which gives a slightly better fit on the model), so I had virtually the same top 5 in terms of games but had a slightly different order (with the Bengals vs the Jets game at the top, from the Eagles vs the Bears game and then Rams vs the Colts). Have to agree with you though the Colts were the most inconsistent team by a mile (especially when you consider they didn&#039;t have as many problems as the Eagles). Out of interest do you have any figures on inconsistency for other years? Things didn&#039;t seem to quite fit for me this year, as I was expecting things to go, and wondered about a variety of different things (I just didn&#039;t get this year at all in many ways).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff as usual. I&#8217;ve started to work out things slightly differently, (I&#8217;ve figured you can do the Winston model, and have it solve for individual home field advantages, which gives a slightly better fit on the model), so I had virtually the same top 5 in terms of games but had a slightly different order (with the Bengals vs the Jets game at the top, from the Eagles vs the Bears game and then Rams vs the Colts). Have to agree with you though the Colts were the most inconsistent team by a mile (especially when you consider they didn&#8217;t have as many problems as the Eagles). Out of interest do you have any figures on inconsistency for other years? Things didn&#8217;t seem to quite fit for me this year, as I was expecting things to go, and wondered about a variety of different things (I just didn&#8217;t get this year at all in many ways).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/ramscolts-was-the-least-conforming-game-of-2013/#comment-84877</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18248#comment-84877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As someone who enjoys predicting scores, etc., I love this kind of stuff...it reminds us that anything can happen after the kickoff, no matter how much we think we &quot;know&quot; the two teams involved. All anyone could say after that Colts/Rams game was, &quot;What the HELL was that?&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who enjoys predicting scores, etc., I love this kind of stuff&#8230;it reminds us that anything can happen after the kickoff, no matter how much we think we &#8220;know&#8221; the two teams involved. All anyone could say after that Colts/Rams game was, &#8220;What the HELL was that?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
