<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Previewing the AFC Championship Game: Baltimore at New England	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/previewing-the-afc-championship-game-baltimore-at-new-england/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/previewing-the-afc-championship-game-baltimore-at-new-england/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/previewing-the-afc-championship-game-baltimore-at-new-england/#comment-6961</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=6265#comment-6961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Using objective analytical stats : If Balt wins Superbowl it would be over a 50 to1 occurrence.
The Nyg in 2007 were a much better team ~11%. before SOS.
&#038; when you consider Rice never came near making the 4th &#038; 29. Officials &#039;choose&#039; to ignore  clear indisputable visual evidence
along with a number of other irregularities - one  credible explanation is that results of games are  manipulated?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using objective analytical stats : If Balt wins Superbowl it would be over a 50 to1 occurrence.<br />
The Nyg in 2007 were a much better team ~11%. before SOS.<br />
&amp; when you consider Rice never came near making the 4th &amp; 29. Officials &#8216;choose&#8217; to ignore  clear indisputable visual evidence<br />
along with a number of other irregularities &#8211; one  credible explanation is that results of games are  manipulated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase Stuart		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/previewing-the-afc-championship-game-baltimore-at-new-england/#comment-6959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=6265#comment-6959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/previewing-the-afc-championship-game-baltimore-at-new-england/#comment-6956&quot;&gt;@thenflanalyst&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks -- I fixed the post.

I don&#039;t think Lewis, Ngata, or Suggs are playing near the levels they were at in 2010 or 2011, so I don&#039;t agree that the Ravens are &quot;back.&quot;  Agreed that they&#039;re healthier now than they have been most of the year, but this is still an inferior defense to what the Ravens usually field.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/previewing-the-afc-championship-game-baltimore-at-new-england/#comment-6956">@thenflanalyst</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks &#8212; I fixed the post.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Lewis, Ngata, or Suggs are playing near the levels they were at in 2010 or 2011, so I don&#8217;t agree that the Ravens are &#8220;back.&#8221;  Agreed that they&#8217;re healthier now than they have been most of the year, but this is still an inferior defense to what the Ravens usually field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
