<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Predictions in Review: NFC South	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/#comment-88914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18055#comment-88914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/#comment-88809&quot;&gt;James&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the link.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/#comment-88809">James</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/#comment-88809</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18055#comment-88809</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/#comment-88569&quot;&gt;Bob&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;I wonder if a playoff team from the previous season has ever entered year N+1 with so much turnover among receiving targets.&quot;

Last year&#039;s Patriots, Favre and the 2001 Packers, and Marino with the 1992 Dolphins by percentage of receiving yards, according to Jason Lisk: http://thebiglead.com/2013/06/21/tom-brady-and-historic-receiving-turnover-in-2013-if-hernandez-is-out-top-five-receivers-from-last-year-could-miss-opener/

With those four gone Newton will lose 58.9% of last year&#039;s receiving yards (Williams had a big chunk, and Hixon only had 55 yards), while I count Brady losing 72.5% last season between Welker, Lloyd, Hernandez, Woodhead, and no names. Whenever Gronk was hurt it was 88.9%!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-south/#comment-88569">Bob</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;I wonder if a playoff team from the previous season has ever entered year N+1 with so much turnover among receiving targets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last year&#8217;s Patriots, Favre and the 2001 Packers, and Marino with the 1992 Dolphins by percentage of receiving yards, according to Jason Lisk: <a href="http://thebiglead.com/2013/06/21/tom-brady-and-historic-receiving-turnover-in-2013-if-hernandez-is-out-top-five-receivers-from-last-year-could-miss-opener/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://thebiglead.com/2013/06/21/tom-brady-and-historic-receiving-turnover-in-2013-if-hernandez-is-out-top-five-receivers-from-last-year-could-miss-opener/</a></p>
<p>With those four gone Newton will lose 58.9% of last year&#8217;s receiving yards (Williams had a big chunk, and Hixon only had 55 yards), while I count Brady losing 72.5% last season between Welker, Lloyd, Hernandez, Woodhead, and no names. Whenever Gronk was hurt it was 88.9%!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
