<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Predictions in Review: NFC North	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-north/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-north/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Laverneus Dinglefoot		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/predictions-in-review-nfc-north/#comment-92762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laverneus Dinglefoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18687#comment-92762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The bit about Rodgers made me think of this. One thing have done  to include sacks in the rating but still produce a number that non-stat people recognize is find ln(ANY/A) and multiply by 50.  It generally spits out a number similar to passer rating.  It may be a bit arbitrary, but when Rodgers is the career leader with 7.59 ANY/A, most fans don&#039;t really &quot;get&quot; that.  My quickfix equation gives him a 101.34, which it closer to what people are used to seeing.

Looking at the career top 10 in ANY/A, only Marino has a passer rating under 90.  But in this system, he gets a 94 as a reward for being so darned good at avoiding sacks.  Like I said, it is somewhat arbitrary, but it gets the job done for this guy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bit about Rodgers made me think of this. One thing have done  to include sacks in the rating but still produce a number that non-stat people recognize is find ln(ANY/A) and multiply by 50.  It generally spits out a number similar to passer rating.  It may be a bit arbitrary, but when Rodgers is the career leader with 7.59 ANY/A, most fans don&#8217;t really &#8220;get&#8221; that.  My quickfix equation gives him a 101.34, which it closer to what people are used to seeing.</p>
<p>Looking at the career top 10 in ANY/A, only Marino has a passer rating under 90.  But in this system, he gets a 94 as a reward for being so darned good at avoiding sacks.  Like I said, it is somewhat arbitrary, but it gets the job done for this guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
