<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pittsburgh&#8217;s Aaron Donald Was Your Combine MVP	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/pittsburghs-aaron-donald-was-your-combine-mvp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/pittsburghs-aaron-donald-was-your-combine-mvp/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 17:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: J		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/pittsburghs-aaron-donald-was-your-combine-mvp/#comment-114609</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18133#comment-114609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great analysis... I would be interested in seeing the differentials as percentages of the expected values rather than absolute numbers, since this would give a better normalization of the data.  For instance, if I expect that a person can do 20 reps on the bench and he does 21 ( 5% higher than expected ), I&#039;m giving him the same credit as a guy who I expect can do 1 and he does 2 ( 100% higher than expected )... After all, if a person can do 20, getting 1 more in is significant, but not nearly as significant as the additional 1 would be to the guy who can do 2, right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis&#8230; I would be interested in seeing the differentials as percentages of the expected values rather than absolute numbers, since this would give a better normalization of the data.  For instance, if I expect that a person can do 20 reps on the bench and he does 21 ( 5% higher than expected ), I&#8217;m giving him the same credit as a guy who I expect can do 1 and he does 2 ( 100% higher than expected )&#8230; After all, if a person can do 20, getting 1 more in is significant, but not nearly as significant as the additional 1 would be to the guy who can do 2, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vincent		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/pittsburghs-aaron-donald-was-your-combine-mvp/#comment-113415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2014 03:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18133#comment-113415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I did a similar analysis using data back to 1999, and the list of &#039;best combine athletes&#039; actually vibed pretty close to my expectations with some players. Vernon Davis was #1, with Mario Williams a close #2, and J.J. Watt at #3. 12-15 were Justin Houston, Margus Hunt, Dontari Poe, DeMarcus Ware.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a similar analysis using data back to 1999, and the list of &#8216;best combine athletes&#8217; actually vibed pretty close to my expectations with some players. Vernon Davis was #1, with Mario Williams a close #2, and J.J. Watt at #3. 12-15 were Justin Houston, Margus Hunt, Dontari Poe, DeMarcus Ware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
