<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Non-FBS College Football Ratings Through 13 Weeks	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase Stuart		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/#comment-61732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=15503#comment-61732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/#comment-61731&quot;&gt;Don&lt;/a&gt;.

Good point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/#comment-61731">Don</a>.</p>
<p>Good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Don		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/non-fbs-college-football-ratings-through-13-weeks/#comment-61731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=15503#comment-61731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The &quot;closed system&quot; is also a problem with the New England Small College Athletic Conference teams - four of them (Trinity CT, Wesleyan, Middlebury, Amherst) are in the top 10 of the Division III SRS ratings, yet none of them are in the tournament.  Of course, this is because these teams are rated only relative to each other, so their ratings will tend to be near zero, while the other schools are rated relative to all other schools, including FBS ones, so their ratings will be much lower.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;closed system&#8221; is also a problem with the New England Small College Athletic Conference teams &#8211; four of them (Trinity CT, Wesleyan, Middlebury, Amherst) are in the top 10 of the Division III SRS ratings, yet none of them are in the tournament.  Of course, this is because these teams are rated only relative to each other, so their ratings will tend to be near zero, while the other schools are rated relative to all other schools, including FBS ones, so their ratings will be much lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
