<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NFL Turnover Rates Continue to Decline; Super Bowl Champs and Turnovers	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richie		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/#comment-303346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=23911#comment-303346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/#comment-303325&quot;&gt;sacramento gold miners&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Never believed in the randomness of championship sports events, not when so many plays are involved.&quot;


The Super Bowl featured about 170 plays.  I wouldn&#039;t consider that &quot;so many plays&quot; to the point of being able to eliminate randomness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/#comment-303325">sacramento gold miners</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Never believed in the randomness of championship sports events, not when so many plays are involved.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Super Bowl featured about 170 plays.  I wouldn&#8217;t consider that &#8220;so many plays&#8221; to the point of being able to eliminate randomness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sacramento gold miners		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/#comment-303344</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sacramento gold miners]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=23911#comment-303344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/#comment-303339&quot;&gt;James&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t believe there are any random plays in an NFL game. Each team prepares during the week, but sometimes another club will surprise the other. That falls on the coaches, or a mistake by the players. In a championship game between two excellent teams, one key play can change everything, good or bad. As much as I agree with others about the mistake Seattle made in not running the ball, we can&#039;t say for sure Lynch would have scored. Looking back, there were still numerous chances for Seattle to win, plays not made offensively and defensively. I&#039;ve watched plenty of games where I felt one team outplayed the other, and that team won the stats battle. 

If we&#039;re not going to use the scoreboard to determine the best team, I can&#039;t see having an on field result overturned by another method. The 2007 Patriots themselves will tell you that had their shots in the Super Bowl that season, but it didn&#039;t turn out for them. With Ed Sabol passing away yesterday, I must use a fitting NFL Films line here from the Super Bowl 14 program, &quot;Great teams aren&#039;t always great, they&#039;re just great when they have to be&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-turnover-rates-continue-to-decline-super-bowl-champs-and-turnovers/#comment-303339">James</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe there are any random plays in an NFL game. Each team prepares during the week, but sometimes another club will surprise the other. That falls on the coaches, or a mistake by the players. In a championship game between two excellent teams, one key play can change everything, good or bad. As much as I agree with others about the mistake Seattle made in not running the ball, we can&#8217;t say for sure Lynch would have scored. Looking back, there were still numerous chances for Seattle to win, plays not made offensively and defensively. I&#8217;ve watched plenty of games where I felt one team outplayed the other, and that team won the stats battle. </p>
<p>If we&#8217;re not going to use the scoreboard to determine the best team, I can&#8217;t see having an on field result overturned by another method. The 2007 Patriots themselves will tell you that had their shots in the Super Bowl that season, but it didn&#8217;t turn out for them. With Ed Sabol passing away yesterday, I must use a fitting NFL Films line here from the Super Bowl 14 program, &#8220;Great teams aren&#8217;t always great, they&#8217;re just great when they have to be&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
