<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New York Times: Post-Week 1, 2013	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/new-york-times-post-week-1-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/new-york-times-post-week-1-2013/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nate		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/new-york-times-post-week-1-2013/#comment-41962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=13736#comment-41962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/new-york-times-post-week-1-2013/#comment-41951&quot;&gt;Chase Stuart&lt;/a&gt;.

By my reconing New England is 163 and 53 since 2001 when Tom Brady started.   The average opponent has  just under a 25% history of win, and rookies won just over 25% of the time, but the sample sizes are way too small to make any meaningful inferences on the scale of the difference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/new-york-times-post-week-1-2013/#comment-41951">Chase Stuart</a>.</p>
<p>By my reconing New England is 163 and 53 since 2001 when Tom Brady started.   The average opponent has  just under a 25% history of win, and rookies won just over 25% of the time, but the sample sizes are way too small to make any meaningful inferences on the scale of the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/new-york-times-post-week-1-2013/#comment-41952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=13736#comment-41952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fair enough. As a predictor of tonight&#039;s outcome that&#039;s a good one. I was just looking at it from the Belicick side and how to put his record in context. 

Last year excepted I would think most rookie QBs have mediocre records, otherwise why were they drafted and why are they starting so soon?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. As a predictor of tonight&#8217;s outcome that&#8217;s a good one. I was just looking at it from the Belicick side and how to put his record in context. </p>
<p>Last year excepted I would think most rookie QBs have mediocre records, otherwise why were they drafted and why are they starting so soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
