<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: My thoughts on trading Darrelle Revis	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/#comment-17584</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=8364#comment-17584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/#comment-15336&quot;&gt;GMC&lt;/a&gt;.

FYI, if you franchise tag a player for a third consecutive year their salary goes up 144%, so Revis&#039;s salary would be $18.7M in 2016. Not that it changes much, but there you go.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/#comment-15336">GMC</a>.</p>
<p>FYI, if you franchise tag a player for a third consecutive year their salary goes up 144%, so Revis&#8217;s salary would be $18.7M in 2016. Not that it changes much, but there you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GMC		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/#comment-15336</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GMC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=8364#comment-15336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/#comment-15334&quot;&gt;GMC&lt;/a&gt;.

The cornerback tag in 2013 is just under $11m, and 120% of Revis&#039; $9M salary is almost precisely the same number.  If he was tagged at that number in 2014, the 2015 re-tag amount would be about $13M, and even 2016 would be $16M.  This is a no-brainer decision for the Jets.

Of course, Revis could hold out, but he&#039;s no spring chicken; losing a year&#039;s salary could be  a big deal as well.

This math - assuming I&#039;m not missing a rule somewhere - also implies that Revis&#039; long term contract will come in lower than a lot of people think.  His bargaining power is terrible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/my-thoughts-on-trading-darrelle-revis/#comment-15334">GMC</a>.</p>
<p>The cornerback tag in 2013 is just under $11m, and 120% of Revis&#8217; $9M salary is almost precisely the same number.  If he was tagged at that number in 2014, the 2015 re-tag amount would be about $13M, and even 2016 would be $16M.  This is a no-brainer decision for the Jets.</p>
<p>Of course, Revis could hold out, but he&#8217;s no spring chicken; losing a year&#8217;s salary could be  a big deal as well.</p>
<p>This math &#8211; assuming I&#8217;m not missing a rule somewhere &#8211; also implies that Revis&#8217; long term contract will come in lower than a lot of people think.  His bargaining power is terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
