<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Most Valuable QBs: Rich Gannon vs. Peyton Manning and the Field (2000)	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2017 17:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bryan Frye		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/#comment-327235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Frye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33664#comment-327235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/#comment-327232&quot;&gt;Wolverine&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s definitely unfair, and it might not even be correct. It&#039;s just my impression of why Moss gets that treatment from the general public when other WRs don&#039;t. I do believe Moss improved his QBs&#039; chances at success, and I also believe great QBs improve their WRs&#039; shot at success. No reason they can&#039;t both be true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/#comment-327232">Wolverine</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely unfair, and it might not even be correct. It&#8217;s just my impression of why Moss gets that treatment from the general public when other WRs don&#8217;t. I do believe Moss improved his QBs&#8217; chances at success, and I also believe great QBs improve their WRs&#8217; shot at success. No reason they can&#8217;t both be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wolverine		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/#comment-327232</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolverine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33664#comment-327232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/#comment-327212&quot;&gt;Bryan Frye&lt;/a&gt;.

All fair points, but as you pointed out above, it&#039;s still unfair when you consider that Culpepper had one of the best seasons of his career with Nate Burleson as his defacto WR1 (and that was Burleson&#039;s best season of his career by a mile...Perhaps it was Culpepper making him look better?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-rich-gannon-vs-peyton-manning-and-the-field-2000/#comment-327212">Bryan Frye</a>.</p>
<p>All fair points, but as you pointed out above, it&#8217;s still unfair when you consider that Culpepper had one of the best seasons of his career with Nate Burleson as his defacto WR1 (and that was Burleson&#8217;s best season of his career by a mile&#8230;Perhaps it was Culpepper making him look better?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
