<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Most Valuable QBs: Ken O&#8217;Brien vs. Dan Marino (1985)	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-ken-obrien-vs-dan-marino-1985/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-ken-obrien-vs-dan-marino-1985/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Shattenjager		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-ken-obrien-vs-dan-marino-1985/#comment-327469</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shattenjager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33778#comment-327469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While he was certainly not Dan Marino in his career, Ken O&#039;Brien seems to me to get mistreated historically. He was a solidly above-average quarterback in spite of his proclivity for taking sacks--he just didn&#039;t last too long.

It does also tell you something about how good Marino was that he put up those numbers in a relatively down season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While he was certainly not Dan Marino in his career, Ken O&#8217;Brien seems to me to get mistreated historically. He was a solidly above-average quarterback in spite of his proclivity for taking sacks&#8211;he just didn&#8217;t last too long.</p>
<p>It does also tell you something about how good Marino was that he put up those numbers in a relatively down season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh Sanford		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-ken-obrien-vs-dan-marino-1985/#comment-327466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Sanford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33778#comment-327466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-ken-obrien-vs-dan-marino-1985/#comment-327465&quot;&gt;Richie&lt;/a&gt;.

Causing a fumble behind the line of scrimmage is wrecking a special kind of havoc, but we don&#039;t have to pretend that it was also a sack.  It wasn&#039;t.  (And soon someone will point out that the sneaky NFL has a rule that a &#039;sack&#039; is not just when the QB gets tackled behind the LOS, but also includes any bad non-pass outcome for the QB.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-valuable-qbs-ken-obrien-vs-dan-marino-1985/#comment-327465">Richie</a>.</p>
<p>Causing a fumble behind the line of scrimmage is wrecking a special kind of havoc, but we don&#8217;t have to pretend that it was also a sack.  It wasn&#8217;t.  (And soon someone will point out that the sneaky NFL has a rule that a &#8216;sack&#8217; is not just when the QB gets tackled behind the LOS, but also includes any bad non-pass outcome for the QB.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
