<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Most Dominant Fantasy Players Since 1950: Quarterbacks	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richie		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/#comment-309291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=25767#comment-309291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/#comment-309257&quot;&gt;Chase&lt;/a&gt;.

For many years I have considered the idea of trying to do a &quot;historical&quot; fantasy football season.  Pick some random year, and then draft players for that year.  And then week by week calculate the results.  Even allow people to make in-season trades despite being able to look up how many points their players are going to score in the future.

Can&#039;t decide if it would actually be fun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/#comment-309257">Chase</a>.</p>
<p>For many years I have considered the idea of trying to do a &#8220;historical&#8221; fantasy football season.  Pick some random year, and then draft players for that year.  And then week by week calculate the results.  Even allow people to make in-season trades despite being able to look up how many points their players are going to score in the future.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t decide if it would actually be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hscer		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/#comment-309285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hscer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=25767#comment-309285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/#comment-309282&quot;&gt;sn0mm1s&lt;/a&gt;.

1/2. Okay, got it. Fair. (I still think them being about equal from &#039;87-90 does mean something.)

3. Well, from &#039;81-90, you have Marino at a 124 ANY/A+, Montana at 123, and the next guys at 119. From &#039;87-90, it&#039;s Montana 1st at 124 and Moon 2nd at 120. Neither of those are anything like Young from &#039;91-98 (130, next highest at 116). 

4. Guess what, this is why I prefer Montana to Young also! I&#039;m just hoping to possibly moderate some of your views. In the 92 game, does Dallas still win if it&#039;s they, not SF, who lose 2 fumbles (by a RB and KR) and get a long TD called back on a penalty?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/most-dominant-fantasy-players-since-1950-quarterbacks/#comment-309282">sn0mm1s</a>.</p>
<p>1/2. Okay, got it. Fair. (I still think them being about equal from &#8217;87-90 does mean something.)</p>
<p>3. Well, from &#8217;81-90, you have Marino at a 124 ANY/A+, Montana at 123, and the next guys at 119. From &#8217;87-90, it&#8217;s Montana 1st at 124 and Moon 2nd at 120. Neither of those are anything like Young from &#8217;91-98 (130, next highest at 116). </p>
<p>4. Guess what, this is why I prefer Montana to Young also! I&#8217;m just hoping to possibly moderate some of your views. In the 92 game, does Dallas still win if it&#8217;s they, not SF, who lose 2 fumbles (by a RB and KR) and get a long TD called back on a penalty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
