<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Knockouts in the NFL	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/knockouts-in-the-nfl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/knockouts-in-the-nfl/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:36:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: George		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/knockouts-in-the-nfl/#comment-29765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=11839#comment-29765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry for being super late on this - I haven&#039;t had access to a computer for about 6 weeks (long story). I just had a couple of quick thoughts on this and was just wondering if there was anything to these;

1) Was there any particular combination that was administering a disproportionate amount of knock-outs (e.g. for New England, Brady to Welker in the red zone on say a shallow cross etc. - I&#039;m just taking a guess or say RG3 to Morris off the left side inside the 5 etc.)?
2) The one that is of real interest to me (that I am starting to look at now I have a computer back), was there a terminal point score of choice - e.g. once a team has scored say 35 points it has an 95+% chance of winning? I&#039;m figuring (taking FG&#039;s out of consideration), the third, fourth or fifth touchdown scored by a team is worth a lot more than the first in terms of a teams chances of winning (e.g. it has a bigger marginal percentage increase in the win chance of a team). And following on from this the say sixth or seventh would be worth less (e.g. with the win in the bag etc.).

Great work as ever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for being super late on this &#8211; I haven&#8217;t had access to a computer for about 6 weeks (long story). I just had a couple of quick thoughts on this and was just wondering if there was anything to these;</p>
<p>1) Was there any particular combination that was administering a disproportionate amount of knock-outs (e.g. for New England, Brady to Welker in the red zone on say a shallow cross etc. &#8211; I&#8217;m just taking a guess or say RG3 to Morris off the left side inside the 5 etc.)?<br />
2) The one that is of real interest to me (that I am starting to look at now I have a computer back), was there a terminal point score of choice &#8211; e.g. once a team has scored say 35 points it has an 95+% chance of winning? I&#8217;m figuring (taking FG&#8217;s out of consideration), the third, fourth or fifth touchdown scored by a team is worth a lot more than the first in terms of a teams chances of winning (e.g. it has a bigger marginal percentage increase in the win chance of a team). And following on from this the say sixth or seventh would be worth less (e.g. with the win in the bag etc.).</p>
<p>Great work as ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: xmenehune		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/knockouts-in-the-nfl/#comment-24688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xmenehune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=11839#comment-24688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BTW nice work, are the results similiar for 2010 and 2011 seasons? just wondering...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW nice work, are the results similiar for 2010 and 2011 seasons? just wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
