<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: John Harbaugh&#8217;s conservative 4th down decisions	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/john-harbaughs-conservative-4th-down-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/john-harbaughs-conservative-4th-down-decisions/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:12:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sunrise089		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/john-harbaughs-conservative-4th-down-decisions/#comment-40872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunrise089]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=13690#comment-40872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/john-harbaughs-conservative-4th-down-decisions/#comment-40869&quot;&gt;Shaun&lt;/a&gt;.

Good catch, I had forgotten about that. I agree with you, but is it possible there was some scheme thing Baltimore saw and didn&#039;t like? I know with SURPRISE onside kicks one idea is that you can kick it deep if the opponents seem prepared for the onside, but in a situation where you need to onside it for clock reasons you&#039;re right that it seems weird to abort it. 

That&#039;s one decision that, along with Denver&#039;s defensive TD-turned-touchback that would have got more attention had the game been closer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/john-harbaughs-conservative-4th-down-decisions/#comment-40869">Shaun</a>.</p>
<p>Good catch, I had forgotten about that. I agree with you, but is it possible there was some scheme thing Baltimore saw and didn&#8217;t like? I know with SURPRISE onside kicks one idea is that you can kick it deep if the opponents seem prepared for the onside, but in a situation where you need to onside it for clock reasons you&#8217;re right that it seems weird to abort it. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s one decision that, along with Denver&#8217;s defensive TD-turned-touchback that would have got more attention had the game been closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shaun		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/john-harbaughs-conservative-4th-down-decisions/#comment-40869</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=13690#comment-40869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What about the fake onside kick? Now there&#039;s a puzzling play, ok here we go we&#039;re gonna onside kick it... Psyche! Burned y&#039;all there! Didn&#039;t see that coming, did ya. What advantage does a team get by successfully executing a fake onside kick?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the fake onside kick? Now there&#8217;s a puzzling play, ok here we go we&#8217;re gonna onside kick it&#8230; Psyche! Burned y&#8217;all there! Didn&#8217;t see that coming, did ya. What advantage does a team get by successfully executing a fake onside kick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
