<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jimmy Johnson Draft Pick Value Calculator	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/jimmy-johnson-draft-pick-value-calculator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:38:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/jimmy-johnson-draft-pick-value-calculator/#comment-18661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?page_id=9691#comment-18661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Using this chart, the Dolphins needed to use the 12th, 42nd, 54th, and 82nd picks to trade up to #3 overall and get a relatively even value.  Even though the JJ chart was made before top picks were cheap (making them MORE valuable), you still have the higher picks with lower relative values in your calculator.  The JJ chart more accurately reflects what teams use in the draft, so why such a large divergence?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using this chart, the Dolphins needed to use the 12th, 42nd, 54th, and 82nd picks to trade up to #3 overall and get a relatively even value.  Even though the JJ chart was made before top picks were cheap (making them MORE valuable), you still have the higher picks with lower relative values in your calculator.  The JJ chart more accurately reflects what teams use in the draft, so why such a large divergence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
