<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Investing heavily in a Left Tackle is a luxury bad teams can not afford	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/investing-heavily-in-a-left-tackle-is-a-luxury-bad-teams-can-not-afford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/investing-heavily-in-a-left-tackle-is-a-luxury-bad-teams-can-not-afford/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: draftrobot		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/investing-heavily-in-a-left-tackle-is-a-luxury-bad-teams-can-not-afford/#comment-3209</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[draftrobot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=3951#comment-3209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting read. While you may have a point that an elite left tackle isn&#039;t a &quot;turnaround&quot; type player in that if you have a top 10 pick, you probably had bad quarterback play or a bad defense, and a left tackle doesn&#039;t do much to help that. However, the numbers show it&#039;s very difficult to get just an average left tackle outside of the top 10-20, so if you&#039;re drafting high and don&#039;t have a shot at a franchise quarterback, fast twitch pass rusher, or shutdown cornerback, it&#039;s not a bad investment to pick a left tackle because if he works out he&#039;s going to play for a long time and it gets monumentally more difficult to find equal value in the 2nd or 3rd rounds. 

And I agree with Independent George that D&#039;Brickashaw Ferguson is not a disappointment, especially when directly compared to Leonard Davis. While Ferguson may have regressed some of late, he&#039;s already been a 7-year starter, whill surely start at least another 5 years, and at his height in 2009 and 2010 played on arguably the best offensive line in the NFL.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read. While you may have a point that an elite left tackle isn&#8217;t a &#8220;turnaround&#8221; type player in that if you have a top 10 pick, you probably had bad quarterback play or a bad defense, and a left tackle doesn&#8217;t do much to help that. However, the numbers show it&#8217;s very difficult to get just an average left tackle outside of the top 10-20, so if you&#8217;re drafting high and don&#8217;t have a shot at a franchise quarterback, fast twitch pass rusher, or shutdown cornerback, it&#8217;s not a bad investment to pick a left tackle because if he works out he&#8217;s going to play for a long time and it gets monumentally more difficult to find equal value in the 2nd or 3rd rounds. </p>
<p>And I agree with Independent George that D&#8217;Brickashaw Ferguson is not a disappointment, especially when directly compared to Leonard Davis. While Ferguson may have regressed some of late, he&#8217;s already been a 7-year starter, whill surely start at least another 5 years, and at his height in 2009 and 2010 played on arguably the best offensive line in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mrh		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/investing-heavily-in-a-left-tackle-is-a-luxury-bad-teams-can-not-afford/#comment-3062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=3951#comment-3062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/investing-heavily-in-a-left-tackle-is-a-luxury-bad-teams-can-not-afford/#comment-3053&quot;&gt;Chase Stuart&lt;/a&gt;.

Sam Bradford got $50M guaranteed on a six year deal or $8.3M/year.  2010 was technically uncapped but the 2009 cap was $123M.  Using that number, Bradford consumed 6.75% of the Rams cap for 2010.

Andrew Luck got $22.1M guaranteed on a four year deal or $5.5M/year.  With a 2012 cap of $120.6M, that&#039;s 4.56% of the Colts cap.  The difference in Bradford&#039;s and Luck&#039;s (simplistic) cap hit leaves 2.19% of this year&#039;s cap to be spent on an offensive lineman, or about $2.6M.  

The Colts actually signed Samson Satele (AV 6 in 2011 or tied for 68th thru 103rd, somewhere in the neighborhood of decent veteran) this off-season for $4M guaranteed over three years ($10.8M total).  We can slice that a lot of ways but it&#039;s less than $2.6M in cap hit this year but more than that for the full contract.  So the difference probably doesn&#039;t quite get a decent vet lineman; only about 75% of one.

Numbers from Rotoworld, anyone w/a better grasp of contract math can chime in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/investing-heavily-in-a-left-tackle-is-a-luxury-bad-teams-can-not-afford/#comment-3053">Chase Stuart</a>.</p>
<p>Sam Bradford got $50M guaranteed on a six year deal or $8.3M/year.  2010 was technically uncapped but the 2009 cap was $123M.  Using that number, Bradford consumed 6.75% of the Rams cap for 2010.</p>
<p>Andrew Luck got $22.1M guaranteed on a four year deal or $5.5M/year.  With a 2012 cap of $120.6M, that&#8217;s 4.56% of the Colts cap.  The difference in Bradford&#8217;s and Luck&#8217;s (simplistic) cap hit leaves 2.19% of this year&#8217;s cap to be spent on an offensive lineman, or about $2.6M.  </p>
<p>The Colts actually signed Samson Satele (AV 6 in 2011 or tied for 68th thru 103rd, somewhere in the neighborhood of decent veteran) this off-season for $4M guaranteed over three years ($10.8M total).  We can slice that a lot of ways but it&#8217;s less than $2.6M in cap hit this year but more than that for the full contract.  So the difference probably doesn&#8217;t quite get a decent vet lineman; only about 75% of one.</p>
<p>Numbers from Rotoworld, anyone w/a better grasp of contract math can chime in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
