<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How Have Previous Eric Deckers Fared?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/how-have-previous-eric-deckers-fared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/how-have-previous-eric-deckers-fared/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Stevens		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/how-have-previous-eric-deckers-fared/#comment-87300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stevens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18379#comment-87300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New York was his first choice due to his reality show with his wife. It was about the money, not winning, and that&#039;s one of the reasons Broncos didn&#039;t make him an offer. Football wasn&#039;t his top priority. We fans in the stands never knew who would show up:  &quot;Good Decker&quot; who would catch 4 TDs or &quot;Bad Decker&quot; who would have one catch and then fumble it out of bounds.  He dropped too many passes he should have caught. I wish him well in NYC, but he will be a cap casualty in 3 years after the guaranteed money runs out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York was his first choice due to his reality show with his wife. It was about the money, not winning, and that&#8217;s one of the reasons Broncos didn&#8217;t make him an offer. Football wasn&#8217;t his top priority. We fans in the stands never knew who would show up:  &#8220;Good Decker&#8221; who would catch 4 TDs or &#8220;Bad Decker&#8221; who would have one catch and then fumble it out of bounds.  He dropped too many passes he should have caught. I wish him well in NYC, but he will be a cap casualty in 3 years after the guaranteed money runs out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nate		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/how-have-previous-eric-deckers-fared/#comment-87081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=18379#comment-87081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/how-have-previous-eric-deckers-fared/#comment-87026&quot;&gt;james&lt;/a&gt;.

It seems the opportunity to be the #1 target in an offense, even mediocre, is a lucrative deal for some wide receivers in this league. Obviously there are guys like Wes Welker who want to play for a winning team, but don&#039;t forget about Greg Jennings who opted to play for the Vikings over a team with a legitimate shot at the playoffs. Jennings was barely a top 40 WR last year, yet in 2011 was easily top 20 (missed time in 2012 with injury). I think Jennings is a far more fair comparison than most of these guys.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/how-have-previous-eric-deckers-fared/#comment-87026">james</a>.</p>
<p>It seems the opportunity to be the #1 target in an offense, even mediocre, is a lucrative deal for some wide receivers in this league. Obviously there are guys like Wes Welker who want to play for a winning team, but don&#8217;t forget about Greg Jennings who opted to play for the Vikings over a team with a legitimate shot at the playoffs. Jennings was barely a top 40 WR last year, yet in 2011 was easily top 20 (missed time in 2012 with injury). I think Jennings is a far more fair comparison than most of these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
