<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Home Teams Have Won 12 Straight Playoff Games; 8 Straight PO Games Decided by 13 Points	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/home-teams-have-won-12-straight-playoff-games-8-straight-po-games-decided-by-13-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/home-teams-have-won-12-straight-playoff-games-8-straight-po-games-decided-by-13-points/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 01:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Johhny Ohrl		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/home-teams-have-won-12-straight-playoff-games-8-straight-po-games-decided-by-13-points/#comment-321679</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johhny Ohrl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=31816#comment-321679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/home-teams-have-won-12-straight-playoff-games-8-straight-po-games-decided-by-13-points/#comment-321675&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt;.

What is a so-called &quot;normal&quot; MOV? I don´t know the exact percentage of close games this year, but read somewhere it is at a record number this season. Thus the MOV shall be too low so far (I think it´s a good idea for an article here?).

Hopefully more &quot;blow-outs&quot; will come in this playoffs to at least even out the numbers to some extend, and more important, the NFL fan finally gets an deserved non-fluke-non-random-non-cheating champion again. The alternative would be NBA like outcomes which are kept artificially* close until the end by absurd rules and the refs (see FBI witness Tim Donaghy).

* If we are honest: Isn´t it already like this? Prevent defenses that only prevent leading teams from winning (and thus artifically induce &quot;drama&quot; to normally decided games), as one player once famously said. Or take the the icing the kicker time-out-rule which artificially lead to absurd double kick attempts in the last seconds of a game, and more...

@ Chase (all?): I thought the high amount of &quot;drama&quot; games the last couple of seasons were normal... until I learned otherwise. As a new AFL fan (for 2+ years now) I found out that games there are more non-random (even though they also have a salary cap and free agency to get &quot;parity&quot;), and much more &quot;blow-outs&quot; occur. For example, there (in the AFL) circa 10% of games end with 4th quarter comebacks, while in the NFL the number is almost as double high, at close to 20%. Is there a statistical method to find out how many games SHOULD be close in a given sport/league? My first wild guess (outside of artificially enhanced drama games ;-) is that the less scoring chances, the closer the games. In pro soccer you have circa 2-3 scores per game, in the NFL 8-9, in the AFL 48-49. I think it would be a great idea for an off season study.

... &quot;For some reason, I have a feeling GB is going to beat DAL today and break the road team&#039;s drought&quot; Good! Everything goes by plan. The Falcons have HFA. It´s a perfect chance for a high scoring offense to prevail again, after a much too long drought. My confidence is high*. My NFL comeback is in the making.
I might be a little concerned if the Pats go to the SB, otoh it should not be too easy for the Falcons. So whoever they get, it´s ok.

Greetings from Germany]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/home-teams-have-won-12-straight-playoff-games-8-straight-po-games-decided-by-13-points/#comment-321675">Adam</a>.</p>
<p>What is a so-called &#8220;normal&#8221; MOV? I don´t know the exact percentage of close games this year, but read somewhere it is at a record number this season. Thus the MOV shall be too low so far (I think it´s a good idea for an article here?).</p>
<p>Hopefully more &#8220;blow-outs&#8221; will come in this playoffs to at least even out the numbers to some extend, and more important, the NFL fan finally gets an deserved non-fluke-non-random-non-cheating champion again. The alternative would be NBA like outcomes which are kept artificially* close until the end by absurd rules and the refs (see FBI witness Tim Donaghy).</p>
<p>* If we are honest: Isn´t it already like this? Prevent defenses that only prevent leading teams from winning (and thus artifically induce &#8220;drama&#8221; to normally decided games), as one player once famously said. Or take the the icing the kicker time-out-rule which artificially lead to absurd double kick attempts in the last seconds of a game, and more&#8230;</p>
<p>@ Chase (all?): I thought the high amount of &#8220;drama&#8221; games the last couple of seasons were normal&#8230; until I learned otherwise. As a new AFL fan (for 2+ years now) I found out that games there are more non-random (even though they also have a salary cap and free agency to get &#8220;parity&#8221;), and much more &#8220;blow-outs&#8221; occur. For example, there (in the AFL) circa 10% of games end with 4th quarter comebacks, while in the NFL the number is almost as double high, at close to 20%. Is there a statistical method to find out how many games SHOULD be close in a given sport/league? My first wild guess (outside of artificially enhanced drama games 😉 is that the less scoring chances, the closer the games. In pro soccer you have circa 2-3 scores per game, in the NFL 8-9, in the AFL 48-49. I think it would be a great idea for an off season study.</p>
<p>&#8230; &#8220;For some reason, I have a feeling GB is going to beat DAL today and break the road team&#8217;s drought&#8221; Good! Everything goes by plan. The Falcons have HFA. It´s a perfect chance for a high scoring offense to prevail again, after a much too long drought. My confidence is high*. My NFL comeback is in the making.<br />
I might be a little concerned if the Pats go to the SB, otoh it should not be too easy for the Falcons. So whoever they get, it´s ok.</p>
<p>Greetings from Germany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/home-teams-have-won-12-straight-playoff-games-8-straight-po-games-decided-by-13-points/#comment-321675</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=31816#comment-321675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s pretty crazy that in this era of so called parity, playoff games continue to be decided to large margins. I&#039;ll bet this run is nothing more than randomness, and we should expect normal MOV and home win % going forward.

For some reason, I have a feeling GB is going to beat DAL today and break the road team&#039;s drought.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty crazy that in this era of so called parity, playoff games continue to be decided to large margins. I&#8217;ll bet this run is nothing more than randomness, and we should expect normal MOV and home win % going forward.</p>
<p>For some reason, I have a feeling GB is going to beat DAL today and break the road team&#8217;s drought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
