<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Guest Post: Support for Manning, Brady, Brees, and Rodgers	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Renan		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/#comment-330569</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33006#comment-330569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/#comment-325546&quot;&gt;Four Touchdowns&lt;/a&gt;.

In the 1st game the Support EP 5-3-1=1.0. So the average EP support is also 0.0.
I still can&#039;t understand how +1.37 rushing, +1.36 defense and +0.42 special teams; and the total is +0.99.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/#comment-325546">Four Touchdowns</a>.</p>
<p>In the 1st game the Support EP 5-3-1=1.0. So the average EP support is also 0.0.<br />
I still can&#8217;t understand how +1.37 rushing, +1.36 defense and +0.42 special teams; and the total is +0.99.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/#comment-327895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2017 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=33006#comment-327895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/#comment-327894&quot;&gt;Renan&lt;/a&gt;.

Right, but for me it&#039;s like, why even bring it up if you&#039;re not going to do anything with it? DVOA is a bit of a black box, but there is A LOT of data available on their site. They&#039;re saying, &quot;Hey we&#039;ve got a great way to analyze football, and here it is&quot;. ESPN is &quot;EP is really great and we use it for stuff&quot;, and then they don&#039;t show you anything. Uh, OK, thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/guest-post-support-for-manning-brady-brees-and-rodgers/#comment-327894">Renan</a>.</p>
<p>Right, but for me it&#8217;s like, why even bring it up if you&#8217;re not going to do anything with it? DVOA is a bit of a black box, but there is A LOT of data available on their site. They&#8217;re saying, &#8220;Hey we&#8217;ve got a great way to analyze football, and here it is&#8221;. ESPN is &#8220;EP is really great and we use it for stuff&#8221;, and then they don&#8217;t show you anything. Uh, OK, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
