≡ Menu

Just above these words, it says “posted by Chase.” And it was literally posted by Chase, but the words below the line belong to Adam Steele, a longtime reader and commenter known by the username “Red”. And I thank him for it. Adam lives in Superior, Colorado and enjoys digging beneath quarterback narratives to discover the truth; hey, who can blame him? One other house-keeping note: I normally provide guest posters with a chance to review my edits prior to posting. But due to time constraints (hey, projecting every quarterback in the NFL wasn’t going to write itself!), I wasn’t able to engage in the usual back and forth discussion with Adam that I’ve done with other guest posters. As a result, I’m apologizing in advance if Adam thinks my edits have changed the intent of his words. But in any event, sit back and get ready to read a very fun post on yards after the catch. When I envisioned guest submissions coming along, stuff like this is exactly what I had in mind.


Introducing Marginal YAC

A quarterback throws a two yard dump off pass to his running back, who proceeds to juke a couple defenders and run 78 yards into the endzone. Naturally, the quarterback deserves credit for an 80 yard pass. Wait, what? Sounds illogical, but that’s the way the NFL has been keeping records since 1932, when it first began recording individual player yardage totals. The inclusion of YAC — yards after the catch — in a quarterback’s passing yards total can really distort efficiency stats, which in turn may distort the way he is perceived.

In response, I created a metric called Marginal YAC (mYAC), which measures how much YAC a quarterback has benefited from compared to an average passer. Its calculation is very straightforward:

mYAC = (YAC/completion – LgAvg YAC/completion) * Completions

I have quarterback YAC data going back to 1992 for every quarterback season with at least 100 pass attempts. [1]This data comes courtesy of sportingcharts.com. It’s obviously unofficial, but there doesn’t seem to be any noticeable biases from one team to another. Some unofficial stats, such as … Continue reading That gives us a healthy sample of 965 seasons to analyze, and includes the full careers of every contemporary quarterback. But first, let’s get a sense of what’s average here. The table below shows the league-wide YAC rates since 1992:

YearAttCompYardsYACYAC/CYAC %
20131813611102129177621715.648.1
20121778810833125951575715.3145.7
20111741010464125330581295.5646.4
20101726910491120964570475.4447.2
20091703310372118917564785.4547.5
20081652610081114766522465.1845.5
20071704510425116874510644.943.7
2006163899796112277503575.1444.9
2005164649790111721475544.8642.6
2004163549772115338472544.8441
2003164939695109467477624.9343.6
20021729210314116201506234.9143.6
2001161819542109639475564.9843.4
2000163229497110131477755.0343.4
1999167609567113254490825.1343.3
199815489876610608643872541.4
1997157298844105288439744.9741.8
1996159669198106661463975.0443.5
1995166999717113069492445.0743.6
1994150568739101884442705.0743.5
199314414835196490396804.7541.1
199213408770592011368454.7840

With the emphasis on the short passing game in recent years, it’s no surprise that YAC per completion has increased over the last decade. In 2013, yards after the catch represented an incredible 48.1% of gross passing yardage. It’ll be interesting to see if the trend continues and eventually pushes YAC above 50%.

So which quarterbacks have benefited the most and least from YAC? The table below shows the top 50 seasons of Marginal YAC since 1992. Daunte Culpepper, with 534 mYAC, is the single-season leader. In 2004, his targets gained 2,376 yards after the catch, producing 6.27 yards per completion after the catch. Since the average reception gained only 4.84 YAC in ’04, that means Culpepper’s Vikings gained 1.43 marginal YAC compared to league average. Multiply that by his 379 completions, and you get Culpepper’s mYAC number of 543.

#QuarterbackTeamYearmYACAttCompYardsYACYAC/CYAC %
1Daunte CulpepperMIN2004543548379471723766.2750.4
2Tom BradyNE2011476611401523527046.7451.7
3Donovan McNabbPHI2006472316180264713977.7652.8
4Kurt WarnerSTL1999461499325435321286.5548.9
5Tony RomoDAL2009451550347448323406.7452.2
6Boomer EsiasonNYJ1993426473288342117956.2352.5
7Steve YoungSF1997424356241302916226.7353.5
8Matt CasselNE2008421516327369321166.4757.3
9Jake DelhommeCAR2005419435262342116926.4649.5
10Philip RiversSD2010414541357471023556.650
11Trent GreenKC2003412523330403920386.1850.5
12Trent GreenKC2002408470287369018176.3349.2
13Kurt WarnerSTL2000404347235342915866.7546.3
14Brett FavreGB2007387535356415521315.9951.3
15Jason CampbellWAS2009380507327361821616.6159.7
16Cam NewtonCAR2012360485280386918486.647.8
17Brett FavreGB2006358613343388521216.1854.6
18Steve YoungSF1994349461324396919906.1450.1
19Nick FolesPHI2013345317203289114827.351.3
20Chris ChandlerATL1998345327190315412966.8241.1
21Vinny TestaverdeCLE1994335376207257513846.6953.7
22Rich GannonOAK1999330515304384018906.2249.2
23Philip RiversSD2009322486317425420486.4648.1
24Brett FavreGB1995315570359441321345.9448.4
25Matthew StaffordDET2013314634371465023926.4551.4
26Jeff GeorgeATL199531455733641432017648.7
27Rich GannonOAK2002309618418468923615.6550.4
28Donovan McNabbPHI2004304469300387517555.8545.3
29Jason CampbellOAK201030332919423871358756.9
30Brett FavreGB2001302510314392118675.9547.6
31Donovan McNabbPHI2009293443267355317476.5449.2
32Brandon WeedenCLE2012293517297338518716.355.3
33Steve YoungSF1993284462314402317765.6644.1
34Tom BradyNE2005282530334411019045.746.3
35David CarrHOU2004282466285353116605.8247
36Steve YoungSF1998279517322417018915.8745.3
37Matt SchaubHOU2011276292178247912657.1151
38Neil O'DonnellPIT1993274486270320815575.7748.5
39Bobby HebertNO1992273422249328714645.8844.5
40Gus FrerotteWAS1997265402204268212796.2747.7
41Jake PlummerDEN2004264521303408917295.7142.3
42Matt HasselbeckSEA2003262513313384118045.7647
43Ryan FitzpatrickBUF2012260505306340018866.1655.5
44Drew BreesNO2006260554356441820905.8747.3
45Aaron RodgersGB2009258541350443421646.1848.8
46Aaron RodgersGB2011258502343464321636.3146.6
47Drew BreesNO2008257635413506923985.8147.3
48Carson PalmerOAK2012255565345401820886.0552
49Jon KitnaDAL2010254318209236513916.6658.8
50Trent GreenKC2005253507317401417935.6644.7

The list is primarily comprised of great quarterbacks playing with great receivers, and bad quarterbacks who threw a bunch of checkdowns. The dichotomy between those two groups makes further analysis a bit murky. How should we divvy up credit for YAC between the quarterback, his receivers, and the system he plays in? I’ve isolated a few cases that may shed some light on the situation.

Here are the Packers during the Mike McCarthy era, with six seasons from Aaron Rodgers and two from Brett Favre:

McCarthy PackersTeamYearmYACAttCompYardsYACYAC/CYAC %
Aaron RodgersGB2013242290193253613236.8552.2
Aaron RodgersGB2012164552371429521355.7549.7
Aaron RodgersGB2011258502343464321636.3146.6
Aaron RodgersGB2010180475312392218776.0247.9
Aaron RodgersGB2009258541350443421646.1848.8
Aaron RodgersGB2008-115536341403816524.8440.9
Brett FavreGB2007387535356415521315.9951.3
Brett FavreGB2006358613343388521216.1854.6

Playing in McCarthy’s system, Green Bay quarterbacks have benefited from positive mYAC in seven out of eight seasons, with an average of 216 mYAC per year. That’s very high, especially considering that such a level was sustained for nearly a decade. Rodgers and Favre are both future Hall-of-Famers, so it’s fair to hypothesize that they have certain skills that allow their receivers to gain a lot of YAC. However, the Packers have been widely recognized as having one of the best receiving corps in the league during that span, and McCarthy has a reputation as a sharp offensive mind. Given all of that, do Rodgers and Favre deserve credit for their receivers’ YAC, or are they beneficiaries of a strong supporting cast and an advantageous system? What do you guys think?

Now let’s take a look at the Patriots during the Bill Belichick era:

Belichick PatriotsTeamYearmYACAttCompYardsYACYAC/CYAC %
Tom BradyNE201323628380434321515.6649.5
Tom BradyNE2012202637401482723335.8248.3
Tom BradyNE2011476611401523527046.7451.7
Tom BradyNE2010244492324390020066.1951.4
Tom BradyNE2009134565371439821545.8149
Matt CasselNE2008421516327369321166.4757.3
Tom BradyNE200770578398480620195.0742
Tom BradyNE200688516319352917285.4249
Tom BradyNE2005282530334411019045.746.3
Tom BradyNE2004-64474288369213294.6136
Tom BradyNE200357527317362016195.1144.7
Tom BradyNE2002151601373376419825.3152.7
Tom BradyNE2001158413264284314745.5851.8
Drew BledsoeNE2000147531312329117175.552.2

This gets even more interesting. The Patriots have gained positive mYAC in 13 of 14 seasons under Belichick, including two seasons over 400. The Pats have been YAC monsters with a HoF quarterback, a mediocre quarterback, and a replacement level quarterback. They’ve done it with a revolving door of receiving targets, representing every conceivable type of pass catcher. They’ve done it with several offensive coordinators, applying conservative run-heavy schemes in the early years, and pass-wacky offenses in recent seasons. The only constant is Belichick. Does this mean Tom Brady is a product of his system? Would he be benefiting from so much YAC if he played for a different coach? The answer might be found in Matt Cassel and Drew Bledsoe:

Cassel with Belichick: +421 mYAC
Cassel without Belichick: -216 mYAC
Bledsoe with Belichick: +147 mYAC
Bledsoe without Belichick: -870 mYAC

The circumstantial evidence does not look good for Brady. Two passers who produce negative mYAC in other systems suddenly become YAC artists playing for The Hoodie. Furthermore, Brady has never been able to throw downfield consistently, so he seems like exactly the type of quarterback who would be dependent on Belichick’s YAC-heavy short passing system to cover his deficiencies.

One last table for the day – the 50 worst Marginal YAC seasons since 1992:

#QuarterbackTeamYearmYACAttCompYardsYACYAC/CYAC %
965Matt RyanATL2010-524571357370514173.9738.2
964Jon KitnaCIN2001-491581313321610693.4233.2
963Mike GlennonTB2013-45841624726089253.7435.5
962Peyton ManningIND2010-444679450470020034.4542.6
961Scott MitchellDET1996-38943725329178873.5130.4
960Drew BledsoeNE1994-359691400455516674.1736.6
959Jeff GeorgeIND1993-35440723425267583.2430
958Peyton ManningIND2006-353557362439715084.1734.3
957Drew BreesNO2010-339658448462020974.6845.4
956Mark BrunellJAC2001-336473289330911043.8233.4
955Hugh MillenNE1992-32420312412032692.1722.4
954Browning NagleNYJ1992-30738719222806113.1826.8
953Mark BrunellJAC1996-299557353436714824.233.9
952Ryan FitzpatrickCIN2008-29737222119058483.8444.5
951Jon KitnaSEA1999-296495270334610894.0332.5
950Peyton ManningIND2008-296555371400216274.3940.7
949Matt RyanATL2009-291451263291611414.3439.1
948Neil O'DonnellCIN1998-28434321222167773.6735.1
947Ryan TannehillMIA2013-284588355391317044.843.5
946Carson PalmerCIN2004-28443226328979883.7634.1
945Mark BrunellJAC2000-283512311364012824.1235.2
944Mark SanchezNYJ2012-281453246288310264.1735.6
943Jon KitnaCIN2002-281473294317811623.9536.6
942Chris ChandlerHOU1995-28035622524608603.8235
941Kordell StewartPIT1998-27945825225609823.938.4
940Eli ManningNYG2008-278479289323812204.2237.7
939Dan OrlovskyIND2011-27819312212014003.2833.3
938Byron LeftwichJAC2004-277441267294110143.834.5
937Mark BrunellJAC1999-274441259306010554.0734.5
936Troy AikmanDAL1996-269465296312612244.1439.2
935Steve McNairTEN2001-269431264335010473.9731.3
934Carson PalmerCIN2010-269586362397017004.742.8
933Carson PalmerCIN2005-268509345383614084.0836.7
932Matt HasselbeckSEA2006-26737121024428133.8733.3
931Matt MooreMIA2011-26634721024979014.2936.1
930Kerry CollinsTEN2010-26427816018236063.7933.2
929Matt SchaubHOU2013-26335821923109634.441.7
928Steve McNairTEN2002-262492301338712154.0435.9
927Mark BrunellJAC1995-25834620121687613.7935.1
926Warren MoonHOU1993-257520303348511833.933.9
925Jim KellyBUF1994-247448285311411974.238.4
924Scott MitchellDET1994-2462461191456357324.5
923Eli ManningNYG2012-245536321394814614.5537
922Chad HenneMIA2010-244490301330113934.6342.2
921Matt CasselKC2009-244493271292412324.5542.1
920Jim EverettNO1996-243464267279711044.1339.5
919David GarrardJAC2008-242535335362014944.4641.3
918Peyton ManningIND2002-240591392420016844.340.1
917Andy DaltonCIN2011-239516300339814284.7642
916Colt McCoyCLE2011-233463265273312394.6845.3

There are a lot of good quarterbacks on this list, including Peyton Manning (x4), Carson Palmer (x3), Mark Brunell (x5), Matt Ryan (x2), Steve McNair (x2), Drew Brees, and Troy Aikman. Why did these guys lose out on so much YAC? Surely their offensive systems were a major factor, emphasizing intermediate sideline routes rather than short passes over the middle. But that begs another question: Do these quarterback’s deserve extra credit for making harder throws that are less reliant on the receiver creating YAC? I’m still torn on what this all means for evaluating quarterbacks.

Before we get to Part II, though, I’d love to hear feedback from you guys.

References

References
1 This data comes courtesy of sportingcharts.com. It’s obviously unofficial, but there doesn’t seem to be any noticeable biases from one team to another. Some unofficial stats, such as passes defensed or quarterback pressures, can vary wildly depending on the scorekeeper, but Sporting Charts’ YAC stats seem pretty fair, from what I can tell. Here is a link to the 2013 data. Chase note: I have not had the chance to compare these numbers to what is on NFLGSIS, but that’s a good idea.
{ 23 comments }