<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fantasy Football: Expected VBD (FBG)	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/fantasy-football-expected-vbd-fbg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/fantasy-football-expected-vbd-fbg/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lenny Pappano		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/fantasy-football-expected-vbd-fbg/#comment-135619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lenny Pappano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=11798#comment-135619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anon, good thoughts in this article... Do you ever consider not only expected production, but ADP in valuating players?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, good thoughts in this article&#8230; Do you ever consider not only expected production, but ADP in valuating players?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Omen		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/fantasy-football-expected-vbd-fbg/#comment-35088</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 03:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=11798#comment-35088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m having trouble understanding how this is an argument against taking a QB early.  The value of the top QB seems to be better than about the 7th RB and 5th WR arguing that you would then have the best value taking the first QB around 13th.  The QB line is also steeper at that point (around 80) indicating that the dropoff is higher for QB relative to RB and WR further supporting the argument to grab the QB at that time.  What am I missing here?
Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having trouble understanding how this is an argument against taking a QB early.  The value of the top QB seems to be better than about the 7th RB and 5th WR arguing that you would then have the best value taking the first QB around 13th.  The QB line is also steeper at that point (around 80) indicating that the dropoff is higher for QB relative to RB and WR further supporting the argument to grab the QB at that time.  What am I missing here?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
