<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Correlating passing stats with wins	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/correlating-passing-stats-with-wins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/correlating-passing-stats-with-wins/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Packers awarded former All-Pro CB Trevon Diggs on waivers &#8211; Bugaluu :: Sports		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/correlating-passing-stats-with-wins/#comment-358060</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Packers awarded former All-Pro CB Trevon Diggs on waivers &#8211; Bugaluu :: Sports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=150#comment-358060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Adjusted yards allowed per coverage snap is like yards allowed per coverage snap, but it treats a surrendered touchdown as a bonus of 20 yards given up (on top of the pure yardage) and an interception caught as wiping out 45 yards. Why treat touchdown and interception values like this? Because it’s much more correlated to wins than passer rating. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Adjusted yards allowed per coverage snap is like yards allowed per coverage snap, but it treats a surrendered touchdown as a bonus of 20 yards given up (on top of the pure yardage) and an interception caught as wiping out 45 yards. Why treat touchdown and interception values like this? Because it’s much more correlated to wins than passer rating. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The science behind NFL Next Gen Stats&#8217; new passing metric - TechMediaGamesBlog@ailinux.me		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/correlating-passing-stats-with-wins/#comment-357283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The science behind NFL Next Gen Stats&#8217; new passing metric - TechMediaGamesBlog@ailinux.me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=150#comment-357283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] rating (QBR), and the Pro Football Focus (PFF) grade, for being calibrated to obsolete data, being unrelated to winning, or scoring players anomalously as when Kyler Murray received the low Madden QB21 rating of 77 [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] rating (QBR), and the Pro Football Focus (PFF) grade, for being calibrated to obsolete data, being unrelated to winning, or scoring players anomalously as when Kyler Murray received the low Madden QB21 rating of 77 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
