<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Completion Percentage and Passing First Down Percentage, Part I	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh Sanford		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/#comment-329419</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Sanford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=35576#comment-329419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/#comment-329330&quot;&gt;AgronomyBrad&lt;/a&gt;.

If so, make it mass emailing to almost ALL of the talking heads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/#comment-329330">AgronomyBrad</a>.</p>
<p>If so, make it mass emailing to almost ALL of the talking heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/#comment-329377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=35576#comment-329377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/#comment-329320&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt;.

I disagree - 1D% is a better measure of offensive play than C%, but as long as the offense is getting first downs, it doesn&#039;t matter if they come through passing, or running.

Moving the ball forwards is always better than not.  Therefore, completion percentage (as long as we&#039;re assuming not a lot of backwards passes) is a good measure.  Whether a given play which attains forward movement gains a first down is subject to a lot more than the passer - there are random elements, and more significantly playcalling aspects to consider.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/completion-percentage-and-passing-first-down-percentage-part-i/#comment-329320">Adam</a>.</p>
<p>I disagree &#8211; 1D% is a better measure of offensive play than C%, but as long as the offense is getting first downs, it doesn&#8217;t matter if they come through passing, or running.</p>
<p>Moving the ball forwards is always better than not.  Therefore, completion percentage (as long as we&#8217;re assuming not a lot of backwards passes) is a good measure.  Whether a given play which attains forward movement gains a first down is subject to a lot more than the passer &#8211; there are random elements, and more significantly playcalling aspects to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
