<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: College Football: The Best Passing Quarterbacks since 2005	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: George		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/#comment-13599</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=8159#comment-13599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/#comment-13556&quot;&gt;Chase Stuart&lt;/a&gt;.

Real interesting stuff and in some respects, someone in the comments at the bottom gets somewhat what I was getting at the other night - if you take the pop rocket move to Austin (or someone else) running a jet motion out  - how does that affect his numbers (also it&#039;s a low risk pass, if Austin misses the catch it&#039;s incomplete - if he catches it, it probably goes for an easy 10 yards so is that potentially easy value when trying to rank something?). 

I know you wouldn&#039;t run that move often during a game but possibly often enough (e.g. the Orange Bowl say 10% of dropbacks). Manziel and Mariota also both potentially project out well being ranked so highly as freshmen (I think statistically both have a drop off next year - gut feeling). 

Also an interesting one to look at is Braxton Miller again - 100% completion of passes behind the line (the sack on 10% of dropbacks, poor completion rate beyond 10 yards, and the fact that he often took off than went through progressions in what was a run orientated offense) probably goes someway to explaining why despite going 11-0 he didn&#039;t make the top 50 the other day. The data set might not be complete but it&#039;s an interesting insight. Opta does this kind of thing for a lot of sports - one English Soccer team released a whole season of data to try and encourage the moneyball moment for Soccer (which hasn&#039;t exactly happened yet).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/#comment-13556">Chase Stuart</a>.</p>
<p>Real interesting stuff and in some respects, someone in the comments at the bottom gets somewhat what I was getting at the other night &#8211; if you take the pop rocket move to Austin (or someone else) running a jet motion out  &#8211; how does that affect his numbers (also it&#8217;s a low risk pass, if Austin misses the catch it&#8217;s incomplete &#8211; if he catches it, it probably goes for an easy 10 yards so is that potentially easy value when trying to rank something?). </p>
<p>I know you wouldn&#8217;t run that move often during a game but possibly often enough (e.g. the Orange Bowl say 10% of dropbacks). Manziel and Mariota also both potentially project out well being ranked so highly as freshmen (I think statistically both have a drop off next year &#8211; gut feeling). </p>
<p>Also an interesting one to look at is Braxton Miller again &#8211; 100% completion of passes behind the line (the sack on 10% of dropbacks, poor completion rate beyond 10 yards, and the fact that he often took off than went through progressions in what was a run orientated offense) probably goes someway to explaining why despite going 11-0 he didn&#8217;t make the top 50 the other day. The data set might not be complete but it&#8217;s an interesting insight. Opta does this kind of thing for a lot of sports &#8211; one English Soccer team released a whole season of data to try and encourage the moneyball moment for Soccer (which hasn&#8217;t exactly happened yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase Stuart		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/#comment-13556</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=8159#comment-13556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/#comment-13452&quot;&gt;Chase Stuart&lt;/a&gt;.

Good stuff from Bill Connolly on Smith: one-third of his passes were behind the LOS

http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2013/2/28/4036850/adjusted-completion-percentages-collin-klein-matt-barkley]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/college-football-the-best-passing-quarterbacks-since-2005/#comment-13452">Chase Stuart</a>.</p>
<p>Good stuff from Bill Connolly on Smith: one-third of his passes were behind the LOS</p>
<p><a href="http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2013/2/28/4036850/adjusted-completion-percentages-collin-klein-matt-barkley" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2013/2/28/4036850/adjusted-completion-percentages-collin-klein-matt-barkley</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
