I find the position stuff so interesting if only because the equations are so markedly different in the “expected score” for nearly every combine event, which I assume is the result of a) recruitment of position-specific skills and body types and b) position-specific training in the weight room and conditioning on the field.

And also because the data is more… well “usable” is the wrong word but I think you know what I mean.

Great comment, Dan. I’m inclined to take the physics side here, although I agree that there are some selection biases in effect. But all else being equal, weight makes it harder to jump high. It might be more interesting to break it down by position, as Arif has done. Tho Dupree and Conley still take the top prize.