<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are The 2017 Jaguars The Next 1986 Bears Or 2009 Jets?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: t.d.		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/#comment-330460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[t.d.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=36302#comment-330460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/#comment-330437&quot;&gt;Richie&lt;/a&gt;.

i mean, the way the pats played, it could be them that the jags are chasing for the #2 seed.  either way, the jags absolutely thumped the steelers in pittsburgh (so much so that people were asking roethlesberger whether his heart was still in the game).  they remind me of the 2015 broncs more though, with the shaky quarterback situation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/#comment-330437">Richie</a>.</p>
<p>i mean, the way the pats played, it could be them that the jags are chasing for the #2 seed.  either way, the jags absolutely thumped the steelers in pittsburgh (so much so that people were asking roethlesberger whether his heart was still in the game).  they remind me of the 2015 broncs more though, with the shaky quarterback situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richie		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/#comment-330437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=36302#comment-330437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/#comment-330416&quot;&gt;sacramento gold miners&lt;/a&gt;.

Pittsburgh&#039;s comeback against Baltimore last night was brutal for Jacksonville.

Jacksonville has a good chance to win out, and they would have been one game behind Pittsburgh, with the Steelers having a game against New England.  If Baltimore could have hung on, that would have given Jacksonville a good shot at the #2 seed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/are-the-2017-jaguars-the-next-1986-bears-or-2009-jets/#comment-330416">sacramento gold miners</a>.</p>
<p>Pittsburgh&#8217;s comeback against Baltimore last night was brutal for Jacksonville.</p>
<p>Jacksonville has a good chance to win out, and they would have been one game behind Pittsburgh, with the Steelers having a game against New England.  If Baltimore could have hung on, that would have given Jacksonville a good shot at the #2 seed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
