<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are Big School Prospects Overrated in the NFL Draft?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/are-big-school-prospects-overrated-in-the-nfl-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/are-big-school-prospects-overrated-in-the-nfl-draft/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Truemper		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/are-big-school-prospects-overrated-in-the-nfl-draft/#comment-18446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Truemper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=9865#comment-18446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like the analysis but do have a quibble with the nomenclature.  Labeling the two groups as Big vs. Small Schools creates a kind of association that then as to be verbally qualified. For example, above, Michigan State and Texas Tech are in the &quot;small school&quot; grouping, but then its stated they are not really small schools as generally understood, but they are in the small group catefory because they have fewer players drafted, and so forth.   I would have used a more literal label for the two catefogories;  High Draft (player #&#039;s) schools vs. Low Draft Schools. Then its understood, and somewhat more immediately revealing that even colleges in major conferences that these schools are classified as Low Draft because numerically they have a lower # of players drafted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the analysis but do have a quibble with the nomenclature.  Labeling the two groups as Big vs. Small Schools creates a kind of association that then as to be verbally qualified. For example, above, Michigan State and Texas Tech are in the &#8220;small school&#8221; grouping, but then its stated they are not really small schools as generally understood, but they are in the small group catefory because they have fewer players drafted, and so forth.   I would have used a more literal label for the two catefogories;  High Draft (player #&#8217;s) schools vs. Low Draft Schools. Then its understood, and somewhat more immediately revealing that even colleges in major conferences that these schools are classified as Low Draft because numerically they have a lower # of players drafted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richie		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/are-big-school-prospects-overrated-in-the-nfl-draft/#comment-18339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=9865#comment-18339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;the best draft class (in terms of draft pick value) by a single school came in 2004, when the Miami Hurricanes sent this impressive haul to the NFL:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...and Sean Taylor was just getting going as a pro before being murdered.  He just had his best season (10 AV) at age 24.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the best draft class (in terms of draft pick value) by a single school came in 2004, when the Miami Hurricanes sent this impressive haul to the NFL:</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;and Sean Taylor was just getting going as a pro before being murdered.  He just had his best season (10 AV) at age 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
