<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Analyzing the last ten years of trading for future first round picks	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/analyzing-the-last-ten-years-of-trading-for-future-first-round-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/analyzing-the-last-ten-years-of-trading-for-future-first-round-picks/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:31:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/analyzing-the-last-ten-years-of-trading-for-future-first-round-picks/#comment-106825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=19224#comment-106825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While it falls just outside the timeframe you&#039;re looking at, another good example happened in the 2003 draft, when Baltimore traded back up into the first round to grab Kyle Boeller. The Patriots received the Ravens 2004 first rounder, which they used on Vince Wilfork. This can be viewed both as another example of Belichick&#039;s patience paying off and as a rare big mistake by Ozzie Newsome.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it falls just outside the timeframe you&#8217;re looking at, another good example happened in the 2003 draft, when Baltimore traded back up into the first round to grab Kyle Boeller. The Patriots received the Ravens 2004 first rounder, which they used on Vince Wilfork. This can be viewed both as another example of Belichick&#8217;s patience paying off and as a rare big mistake by Ozzie Newsome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/analyzing-the-last-ten-years-of-trading-for-future-first-round-picks/#comment-106824</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=19224#comment-106824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/analyzing-the-last-ten-years-of-trading-for-future-first-round-picks/#comment-106797&quot;&gt;Kibbles&lt;/a&gt;.

I hear ya. Lots of people like the mock drafts for the entertainment. But to me it&#039;s all wishful thinking. It doesn&#039;t matter how many mock drafts have Clowney going 1st, it not going to stop Houston from taking a QB. Clowney or a QB? Who the hell really knows, just sit back and enjoy the show.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/analyzing-the-last-ten-years-of-trading-for-future-first-round-picks/#comment-106797">Kibbles</a>.</p>
<p>I hear ya. Lots of people like the mock drafts for the entertainment. But to me it&#8217;s all wishful thinking. It doesn&#8217;t matter how many mock drafts have Clowney going 1st, it not going to stop Houston from taking a QB. Clowney or a QB? Who the hell really knows, just sit back and enjoy the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
